Association of neutralizing breadth against SARS-CoV-2 with inoculation orders of heterologous prime-boost vaccines.
Association of neutralizing breadth against SARS-CoV-2 with inoculation orders of heterologous prime-boost vaccines.
复制标题
SARS-CoV-2 中和广度与异源初免-加强疫苗接种顺序的关联
DOI:
10.1016/j.medj.2022.05.003
复制
发表时间:
2022-08-12
期刊:
影响因子:
17
通讯作者:
Hong, Peng
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhu, Yufan;Lu, Yingyin;Zhou, Cail;Tong, Ganglin;Gao, Manman;Zhan, Yan;Wang, Yan;Liang, Ran;Li, Yawei;Gao, Tianjiao;Wang, Li;Zhang, Muyun;Cheng, Jin;Gong, Jun;Wang, Jimin;Zhang, Wei;Qi, Junhua;Cui, Miao;Zhu, Longchao;Xiao, Fenglian;Zhu, Linyu;Xu, Yunsheng;Zheng, Zhihua;Zhou, Zhiyu;Cheng, Zhengjiang;Hong, Peng
Emerging evidence suggests heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination as a superior strategy than homologous schedules. Animal experiments and clinical observations have shown enhanced antibody response against influenza variants after heterologous vaccination; however, whether the inoculation order of COVID-19 vaccines in a prime-boost schedule affects antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 variants is not clear. We conducted immunological analyses in a cohort of health care workers (n = 486) recently vaccinated by three types of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines under homologous or heterologous prime-boost schedules. Antibody response against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) was assessed by total antibody measurements, surrogate virus neutralization tests, and pseudovirus neutralization assays (PNA). Furthermore, serum neutralization activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern was also measured by PNA. We observed strongest serum neutralization activity against the widely circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 among recipients of heterologous BBIBP-CorV/CoronaVac and WIBP-CorV/CoronaVac. In contrast, recipients of CoronaVac/BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac/WIBP-CorV showed significantly lower B.1.617.2 neutralization titers than recipients of reverse schedules. Laboratory tests revealed that neutralizing activity against common variants but not the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 was associated with the inoculation order of heterologous prime-boost vaccines. Multivariable regression analyses confirmed this association after adjusting for known confounders. Our data provide clinical evidence of inoculation order-dependent expansion of neutralizing breadth against SARS-CoV-2 in recipients of heterologous prime-boost vaccination and call for further studies into its underlying mechanism. National Key R&D Program of China, National Development and Re-form Commission of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission, and US Department of Veterans Affairs. Many people around the world have received different types of COVID-19 vaccines in their two-dose vaccination schedules for various reasons. However, it is not clear whether the inoculation order of such heterologous vaccines was associated with subsequent immune responses. Here, an international team of physicians and scientists from China and the United States studied a cohort of healthcare workers who were among the earliest recipients of heterologous COVID-19 vaccination. The authors found that the inoculation order of heterologous vaccines was associated with the capability of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 variants but not the original strain that the vaccines were based on. The results suggested that using heterologous booster vaccines with high potency could be a cost-efficient way to elicit protective immunity against future variants. Zhu et al. studied healthcare workers who had received homologous or heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination to find that the inoculation order of heterologous vaccines was associated with serum neutralization breadth against SARS-CoV-2 variants. The findings suggested using heterologous booster vaccines with high potency as a cost-efficient strategy against future variants.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Liu C;Ginn HM;Dejnirattisai W;Supasa P;Wang B;Tuekprakhon A;Nutalai R;Zhou D;Mentzer AJ;Zhao Y;Duyvesteyn HME;López-Camacho C;Slon-Campos J;Walter TS;Skelly D;Johnson SA;Ritter TG;Mason C;Costa Clemens SA;Gomes Naveca F;Nascimento V;Nascimento F;Fernandes da Costa C;Resende PC;Pauvolid-Correa A;Siqueira MM;Dold C;Temperton N;Dong T;Pollard AJ;Knight JC;Crook D;Lambe T;Clutterbuck E;Bibi S;Flaxman A;Bittaye M;Belij-Rammerstorfer S;Gilbert SC;Malik T;Carroll MW;Klenerman P;Barnes E;Dunachie SJ;Baillie V;Serafin N;Ditse Z;Da Silva K;Paterson NG;Williams MA;Hall DR;Madhi S;Nunes MC;Goulder P;Fry EE;Mongkolsapaya J;Ren J;Stuart DI;Screaton GR
通讯作者:
Screaton GR
影响因子:
7.8
作者:
Khong KW;Liu D;Leung KY;Lu L;Lam HY;Chen L;Chan PC;Lam HM;Xie X;Zhang R;Fan Y;To KK;Chen H;Yuen KY;Chan KH;Hung IF
通讯作者:
Hung IF
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Liu, Wanbing;Kou, Guomei;Zheng, Shangen
通讯作者:
Zheng, Shangen
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Schmidt T;Klemis V;Schub D;Mihm J;Hielscher F;Marx S;Abu-Omar A;Ziegler L;Guckelmus C;Urschel R;Schneitler S;Becker SL;Gärtner BC;Sester U;Sester M
通讯作者:
Sester M
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2105000
发表时间:
2021-06-10
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hacisuleyman E;Hale C;Saito Y;Blachere NE;Bergh M;Conlon EG;Schaefer-Babajew DJ;DaSilva J;Muecksch F;Gaebler C;Lifton R;Nussenzweig MC;Hatziioannou T;Bieniasz PD;Darnell RB
通讯作者:
Darnell RB