Robustness of differential gene expression analysis of RNA-seq.

Robustness of differential gene expression analysis of RNA-seq.
复制标题

RNA-seq差异基因表达分析的稳健性

DOI:
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.040
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
6
通讯作者:
McArt DG
McArt DG
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stupnikov A;McInerney CE;Savage KI;McIntosh SA;Emmert-Streib F;Kennedy R;Salto-Tellez M;Prise KM;McArt DG

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) is a relatively new technology that lacks standardisation. RNA-seq can be used for Differential Gene Expression (DGE) analysis, however, no consensus exists as to which methodology ensures robust and reproducible results. Indeed, it is broadly acknowledged that DGE methods provide disparate results. Despite obstacles, RNA-seq assays are in advanced development for clinical use but further optimisation will be needed. Herein, five DGE models (DESeq2, voom + limma, edgeR, EBSeq, NOISeq) for gene-level detection were investigated for robustness to sequencing alterations using a controlled analysis of fixed count matrices. Two breast cancer datasets were analysed with full and reduced sample sizes. DGE model robustness was compared between filtering regimes and for different expression levels (high, low) using unbiased metrics. Test sensitivity estimated as relative False Discovery Rate (FDR), concordance between model outputs and comparisons of a ’population’ of slopes of relative FDRs across different library sizes, generated using linear regressions, were examined. Patterns of relative DGE model robustness proved dataset-agnostic and reliable for drawing conclusions when sample sizes were sufficiently large. Overall, the non-parametric method NOISeq was the most robust followed by edgeR, voom, EBSeq and DESeq2. Our rigorous appraisal provides information for method selection for molecular diagnostics. Metrics may prove useful towards improving the standardisation of RNA-seq for precision medicine.
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
发表时间: 2015-01-15
期刊: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
影响因子: --
作者:
Anders S;Pyl PT;Huber W
通讯作者: Huber W
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
发表时间: 2012-03-04
期刊: NATURE METHODS
影响因子: 48
作者:
Langmead, Ben;Salzberg, Steven L.
通讯作者: Salzberg, Steven L.
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7
发表时间: 2015-10-28
期刊: BMC bioinformatics
影响因子: 3
作者:
Li P;Piao Y;Shon HS;Ryu KH
通讯作者: Ryu KH
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1196
发表时间: 2014-01
影响因子: 14.9
作者:
Flicek P;Amode MR;Barrell D;Beal K;Billis K;Brent S;Carvalho-Silva D;Clapham P;Coates G;Fitzgerald S;Gil L;Girón CG;Gordon L;Hourlier T;Hunt S;Johnson N;Juettemann T;Kähäri AK;Keenan S;Kulesha E;Martin FJ;Maurel T;McLaren WM;Murphy DN;Nag R;Overduin B;Pignatelli M;Pritchard B;Pritchard E;Riat HS;Ruffier M;Sheppard D;Taylor K;Thormann A;Trevanion SJ;Vullo A;Wilder SP;Wilson M;Zadissa A;Aken BL;Birney E;Cunningham F;Harrow J;Herrero J;Hubbard TJ;Kinsella R;Muffato M;Parker A;Spudich G;Yates A;Zerbino DR;Searle SM
通讯作者: Searle SM
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182694
发表时间: 2017
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Mohorianu I;Bretman A;Smith DT;Fowler EK;Dalmay T;Chapman T
通讯作者: Chapman T