Completeness in Proof-Theoretic Semantics

Completeness in Proof-Theoretic Semantics
复制标题

证明理论语义的完整性

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-22686-6_15
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Thomas Piecha
Thomas Piecha
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thomas Piecha

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们给出了一个概述证明理论语义的完整性和不完整性的结果。Prawitz证明了直觉主义一阶逻辑对于证明论语义学中某些有效性概念的完备性。对于他所提出的那种语义学,这个猜想还没有定论。对于某些变体的证明理论语义的完整性问题得到解决,包括一个积极的结果,经典逻辑。对于直觉逻辑,有正的和负的完备性结果,这取决于所考虑的语义变体。对于一阶语言的某些片段,已经获得了进一步的结果。
We give an overview of completeness and incompleteness results within proof-theoretic semantics. Completeness of intuitionistic first-order logic for certain notions of validity in proof-theoretic semantics has been conjectured by Prawitz. For the kind of semantics proposed by him, this conjecture is still undecided. For certain variants of proof-theoretic semantics the completeness question is settled, including a positive result for classical logic. For intuitionistic logic there are positive as well as negative completeness results, depending on which variant of semantics is considered. Further results have been obtained for certain fragments of first-order languages.
证明理论语义中的原子系统:两种方法
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Piecha;P. Schroeder
通讯作者: P. Schroeder
证明理论语义的完整性失败
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-014-9322-x
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Piecha;Schroeder-Heister;P. (with W. de Campos Sanz)
通讯作者: P. (with W. de Campos Sanz)
关于直觉形式系统中 A→B ν C,A →(Ex)B(x) 类型的公式
DOI: --
发表时间: 1960
期刊: Journal of Symbolic Logic (JSL)
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Harrop
通讯作者: R. Harrop
迈向一般证明理论的基础
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-237x(09)70361-1
发表时间: 1973
期刊: Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Prawitz
通讯作者: D. Prawitz
DOI: 10.1023/a:1005217827758
发表时间: 2000
期刊: Studia Logica
影响因子: 0.7
作者:
H. Wansing
通讯作者: H. Wansing