Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.
Estimating the distance separating fluorescent protein FRET pairs.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.06.021
复制
发表时间:
2014-03-15
期刊:
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Blank, Paul S.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vogel, Steven S.;van der Meer, B. Wieb;Blank, Paul S.
关键词:
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) describes a physical phenomenon widely applied in biomedical research to estimate separations between biological molecules. Routinely, genetic engineering is used to incorporate spectral variants of the green fluorescent protein (GFPs), into cellular expressed proteins. The transfer efficiency or rate of energy transfer between donor and acceptor FPs is then assayed. As appreciable FRET occurs only when donors and acceptors are in close proximity (1–10 nm), the presence of FRET may indicate that the engineered proteins associate as interacting species. For a homogeneous population of FRET pairs the separations between FRET donors and acceptors can be estimated from a measured FRET efficiency if it is assumed that donors and acceptors are randomly oriented and rotate extensively during their excited state (dynamic regime). Unlike typical organic fluorophores, the rotational correlation-times of FPs are typically much longer than their fluorescence lifetime; accordingly FPs are virtually static during their excited state. Thus, estimating separations between FP FRET pairs is problematic. To overcome this obstacle, we present here a simple method for estimating separations between FPs using the experimentally measured average FRET efficiency. This approach assumes that donor and acceptor fluorophores are randomly oriented, but do not rotate during their excited state (static regime). This approach utilizes a Monte-Carlo simulation generated look-up table that allows one to estimate the separation, normalized to the Förster distance, from the average FRET efficiency. Assuming a dynamic regime overestimates the separation significantly (by 10% near 0.5 and 30% near 0.75 efficiencies) compared to assuming a static regime, which is more appropriate for estimates of separations between FPs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
7.8
作者:
Sekar, Rajesh Babu;Periasamy, Ammasi
通讯作者:
Periasamy, Ammasi
影响因子:
46.9
作者:
Nagai, T;Ibata, K;Miyawaki, A
通讯作者:
Miyawaki, A
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
van der Meer, B W
通讯作者:
van der Meer, B W
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Dickson, RM;Cubitt, AB;Moerner, WE
通讯作者:
Moerner, WE
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Knox, RS;van Amerongen, H
通讯作者:
van Amerongen, H