Neighbourhood natural space and the narrowing of socioeconomic inequality in children's social, emotional, and behavioural wellbeing.
Neighbourhood natural space and the narrowing of socioeconomic inequality in children's social, emotional, and behavioural wellbeing.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.wss.2021.100051
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mitchell, Rich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mccrorie, Paul;Olsen, Jonathan R.;Caryl, Fiona M.;Nicholls, Natalie;Mitchell, Rich
家庭100米内的自然空间与情感问题呈负相关，家庭100米内的自然空间与亲社会行为呈正相关。自然空间与亲社会行为的关系在低收入家庭中更为明显，而私人花园空间对高收入家庭的儿童更有益。自然环境可能有利于儿童的社会、情感和行为健康，同时为缩小社会经济健康不平等提供杠杆。我们调查了邻近的自然空间和私人花园是否与儿童的健康结果有关，以及这些关系是否受到家庭收入的调节。方法：从苏格兰儿童环境中的体育活动研究中选取774名儿童（55%为女性，10/11岁）作为全国代表性样本。社会、情感和行为困难得分（优势和困难问卷）代表健康结果。使用地形测量的MasterMap terrain Layer®对儿童住所100米范围内的自然空间和私人花园的百分比进行了量化。线性回归，包括相互作用项，探讨了两个主要的研究问题。结果：居住自然空间增加10%，情绪问题得分降低0.08 (-0.15,-0.01;95%CI)，亲社会行为得分提高0.09 （0.02,0.16;95%CI）。家庭收入调节了%自然空间和私人花园在亲社会行为得分之间的关联：对于自然空间，最低收入五分位数的家庭存在正相关关系（0.25 (0.09,0.41;95%CI)），而最高收入五分位数的家庭存在零相关关系（-0.07 (-0.16,0.02;95%CI)）。对于私家园林空间，最高五分位与最低五分位呈负相关（-0.30 (-0.50,-0.07,95%CI)），最高五分位与0.15 （0.05,0.26,95%CI）呈正相关。结论：自然环境可以成为有利于弱势群体的杠杆，尤其是亲社会行为的发展。
Natural space (NS) within 100 m of home is negatively associated with emotional problems NS within 100 m of home is positively associated with prosocial behaviours Relationship between NS and prosocial behaviours stronger in low-income families Whereas private garden space more beneficial in children from high-income families Increasing residential NS may help narrow inequalities in health and wellbeing Introduction: The natural environment may benefit children's social, emotional and behavioural wellbeing, whilst offering a lever to narrow socioeconomic health inequalities. We investigated whether immediate neighbourhood natural space and private gardens were related to children's wellbeing outcomes and whether these relationships were moderated by household income. Methods: A nationally representative sample of 774 children (55% female, 10/11 years old) from the Studying Physical Activity in Children's Environments across Scotland study. Social, emotional and behavioural difficulty scores (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) represented wellbeing outcomes. Percentage of total natural space and private gardens within 100m of the child's residence was quantified using Ordnance Survey's MasterMap Topography Layer®. Linear regression, including interaction terms, explored the two main research questions. Results: A 10% increase in residential natural space was associated with a 0.08 reduction (-0.15, -0.01; 95%CI) in Emotional Problem scores and a 0.09 improvement (0.02, 0.16; 95%CI) in Prosocial Behaviour scores. Household income moderated the associations between % natural space and private gardens on Prosocial Behaviour scores: for natural space, there was a positive relationship for those in the lowest income quintile (0.25 (0.09, 0.41; 95%CI)) and a null relationship for those in the highest quintile (-0.07 (-0.16, 0.02; 95%CI)). For private garden space, there was a positive relationship for those in the highest quintile (0.15 (0.05, 0.26; 95%CI)) and negative relationship with those in the lowest quintile (-0.30 (-0.50, -0.07, 95%CI)). Conclusion: The natural environment could be a lever to benefit those from less advantaged backgrounds, particularly the development of prosocial behaviours.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Mark, Katharine M.;Pike, Alison
通讯作者：
Pike, Alison
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Agay-Shay, Keren;Peled, Ammatzia;Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
通讯作者：
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph6092332
发表时间：
2009-09
影响因子：
--
作者：
Grinde B;Patil GG
通讯作者：
Patil GG
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Macdonald, Laura;McCrorie, Paul;Olsen, Jonathan R.
通讯作者：
Olsen, Jonathan R.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Flook, Lisa;Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn;Davidson, Richard J.
通讯作者：
Davidson, Richard J.