A response to Fagundes and Coyne's “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education”
A response to Fagundes and Coyne's “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education”
复制标题
对 Fagundes 和 Coyne 的“促进有效和包容性生物学教育的策略”的回应
DOI:
10.1093/biosci/biad028
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
10.1
通讯作者:
Weber, Marjorie G.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zemenick, Ash T.;Turney, Shaun;Webster, Alex J.;Jones, Sarah C.;Weber, Marjorie G.
In their response to our (2022) article “Six principles for embracing gender and sexual diversity in postsecondary biology classrooms” entitled “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education,” Fagundes and Coyne employ the naturalistic fallacy as an argument against a diversity-first model for inclusive biology education. In particular, Fagundes and Coyne argue that the naturalistic fallacy should be elevated to a primary principle of inclusive biology education, whereas our diversity-first framework should be avoided. We disagree with their portrayal of our article and their suggestions, and we wish to respond with three points.First, Fagundes and Coyne acknowledge but largely disregard our discussion of the naturalistic fallacy. We point Fagundes and Coyne to our original article, where we discuss the naturalistic fallacy and its importance in teaching biology (the second line of our abstract and in paragraph 11). In these sections of our article, we anticipate, address, and disarm the major argument brought up by Coyne and Fagundes. For example, in discussing the diversityfirst approach to teaching, we state:
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
E. Gibney
通讯作者:
E. Gibney
影响因子:
0.7
作者:
Helen A. Archibald
通讯作者:
Helen A. Archibald