A response to Fagundes and Coyne's “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education”

A response to Fagundes and Coyne's “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education”
复制标题

对 Fagundes 和 Coyne 的“促进有效和包容性生物学教育的策略”的回应

DOI:
10.1093/biosci/biad028
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
10.1
通讯作者:
Weber, Marjorie G.
Weber, Marjorie G.
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zemenick, Ash T.;Turney, Shaun;Webster, Alex J.;Jones, Sarah C.;Weber, Marjorie G.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在他们对我们的回应(2022年)文章“六项原则,为拥抱性别和性的多样性在中学后生物学教室”题为“战略,促进有效和包容性的生物学教育”,法贡代和科因雇用的自然主义谬误作为反对多样性第一模型的论点包容性生物学教育。特别是,法贡代和科因认为,自然主义的谬误应该被提升为包容性生物学教育的主要原则,而我们的多样性第一的框架应该避免。我们不同意他们对我们文章的描述和他们的建议,我们希望用三点来回应:第一,法贡代和科因承认,但在很大程度上无视我们对自然主义谬误的讨论。我们指出法贡代和科因在我们的原始文章中讨论了自然主义谬误及其在生物学教学中的重要性(我们摘要的第二行和第11段)。在本文的这些部分中,我们预测、解决并消除了科因和法贡代提出的主要论点。例如,在讨论多样性优先的教学方法时,我们指出:
In their response to our (2022) article “Six principles for embracing gender and sexual diversity in postsecondary biology classrooms” entitled “Strategies for promoting effective and inclusive biology education,” Fagundes and Coyne employ the naturalistic fallacy as an argument against a diversity-first model for inclusive biology education. In particular, Fagundes and Coyne argue that the naturalistic fallacy should be elevated to a primary principle of inclusive biology education, whereas our diversity-first framework should be avoided. We disagree with their portrayal of our article and their suggestions, and we wish to respond with three points.First, Fagundes and Coyne acknowledge but largely disregard our discussion of the naturalistic fallacy. We point Fagundes and Coyne to our original article, where we discuss the naturalistic fallacy and its importance in teaching biology (the second line of our abstract and in paragraph 11). In these sections of our article, we anticipate, address, and disarm the major argument brought up by Coyne and Fagundes. For example, in discussing the diversityfirst approach to teaching, we state:
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
E. Gibney
通讯作者: E. Gibney
自然主义谬误
DOI: 10.1080/0034408800750205
发表时间: 1980
影响因子: 0.7
作者:
Helen A. Archibald
通讯作者: Helen A. Archibald