A Standards Organization for Open and FAIR Neuroscience: the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility.

A Standards Organization for Open and FAIR Neuroscience: the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s12021-020-09509-0
复制
发表时间:
2022-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们非常需要围绕神经科学的标准和最佳实践进行协调,以支持使神经科学成为以数据为中心的学科的努力。世界各地发起的重大大脑计划准备产生大量的神经科学数据。与此同时,神经科学和生物医学的许多领域一样,也面临着透明度、严谨性和可重复性的问题。广泛使用的、经过验证的标准和最佳实践是解决大数据和小数据科学挑战的关键,因为它们对于整合不同的数据和开发强大、有效和可持续的基础设施以支持开放和可复制的神经科学至关重要。然而,制定社区标准并获得采用是困难的。目前的情况是,既缺乏强有力的、经过验证的标准,又有大量重叠、欠发达、未经测试和利用不足的标准和最佳做法。国际神经信息学协调机构(INCF)是一个致力于通过协调基础设施和标准来促进数据共享的独立组织,最近实施了一项正式程序,用于评估和认可支持FAIR原则的社区标准和最佳实践。通过正式作为一个致力于开放和公平神经科学的标准组织,INCF帮助评估,颁布和协调神经科学的标准和最佳实践。在这里,我们提供了一个过程的概述,并讨论了神经科学如何从拥有一个专门的标准机构中受益。
There is great need for coordination around standards and best practices in neuroscience to support efforts to make neuroscience a data-centric discipline. Major brain initiatives launched around the world are poised to generate huge stores of neuroscience data. At the same time, neuroscience, like many domains in biomedicine, is confronting the issues of transparency, rigor, and reproducibility. Widely used, validated standards and best practices are key to addressing the challenges in both big and small data science, as they are essential for integrating diverse data and for developing a robust, effective, and sustainable infrastructure to support open and reproducible neuroscience. However, developing community standards and gaining their adoption is difficult. The current landscape is characterized both by a lack of robust, validated standards and a plethora of overlapping, underdeveloped, untested and underutilized standards and best practices. The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF), an independent organization dedicated to promoting data sharing through the coordination of infrastructure and standards, has recently implemented a formal procedure for evaluating and endorsing community standards and best practices in support of the FAIR principles. By formally serving as a standards organization dedicated to open and FAIR neuroscience, INCF helps evaluate, promulgate, and coordinate standards and best practices across neuroscience. Here, we provide an overview of the process and discuss how neuroscience can benefit from having a dedicated standards body.
观察研究设计的数据获取,质量和策展指南(DAQCORD)。
DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.24
发表时间: 2020-03-13
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Ercole A;Brinck V;George P;Hicks R;Huijben J;Jarrett M;Vassar M;Wilson L;DAQCORD collaborators
通讯作者: DAQCORD collaborators
DOI: 10.1186/s13742-016-0129-2
发表时间: 2016-06-02
期刊: GIGASCIENCE
影响因子: 9.2
作者:
Mofiz, Ehtesham;Holt, Deborah C.;Papenfuss, Anthony T.
通讯作者: Papenfuss, Anthony T.
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44
发表时间: 2016-06-21
期刊: Scientific data
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Gorgolewski KJ;Auer T;Calhoun VD;Craddock RC;Das S;Duff EP;Flandin G;Ghosh SS;Glatard T;Halchenko YO;Handwerker DA;Hanke M;Keator D;Li X;Michael Z;Maumet C;Nichols BN;Nichols TE;Pellman J;Poline JB;Rokem A;Schaefer G;Sochat V;Triplett W;Turner JA;Varoquaux G;Poldrack RA
通讯作者: Poldrack RA
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.010
发表时间: 2015-07-15
影响因子: 10.6
作者:
Lefebvre, Aline;Beggiato, Anita;Toro, Roberto
通讯作者: Toro, Roberto
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3838
发表时间: 2014-11
影响因子: 25
作者:
Ferguson AR;Nielson JL;Cragin MH;Bandrowski AE;Martone ME
通讯作者: Martone ME