Beyond the Schoolyard: The Contributions of Parenting Logics, Financial Resources, and Social Institutions to the Social Class Gap in Structured Activity Participation.
Beyond the Schoolyard: The Contributions of Parenting Logics, Financial Resources, and Social Institutions to the Social Class Gap in Structured Activity Participation.
复制标题
超越校园：养育逻辑、财政资源和社会制度对结构化活动参与中社会阶级差距的贡献。
DOI：
10.1177/0038040711431585
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Jayaram L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bennett PR;Lutz A;Jayaram L
本研究以访谈、问卷调查及档案资料，探讨青少年活动参与之阶层差异之文化与结构来源。我们发现，工薪阶层和中产阶级的父母在参与育儿逻辑上存在重叠，尽管在一个方面有所不同：中产阶级的父母关心的是定制儿童参与活动，而工薪阶层的父母关心的是通过参与实现儿童的安全和社会流动性。第二，由于财政拮据，工人阶级家庭依靠社会机构获得参与机会，但机会很少。学校通过提供低成本的活动发挥了平等机构的作用，使工人阶级儿童在学校活动中与中产阶级青年相似，但他们在校外活动中仍然处于不利地位。然而，学校的影响是复杂的，因为学校为工人和中产阶级青年提供不同的活动，也助长了阶级差异。调查结果提出了一个问题，即参与的差异在多大程度上反映了班级文化，而不是父母面临的客观现实。
We investigate cultural and structural sources of class differences in youth activity participation with interview, survey, and archival data. We find working- and middle-class parents overlap in parenting logics about participation, though differ in one respect: middle-class parents are concerned with customizing children’s involvement in activities, while working-class parents are concerned with achieving safety and social mobility for children through participation. Second, because of financial constraints, working-class families rely on social institutions for participation opportunities, but few are available. Schools act as an equalizing institution by offering low-cost activities, allowing working-class children to resemble middle-class youth in school activities, but they remain disadvantaged in out-of-school activities. School influences are complex, however, as they also contribute to class differences by offering different activities to working- and middle-class youth. Findings raise questions about the extent to which differences in participation reflect class culture rather than the objective realities parents face.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2
作者：
Barber, BL;Eccles, JS;Stone, MR
通讯作者：
Stone, MR
影响因子：
9.1
作者：
Downey, DB;von Hippel, PT;Broh, BA
通讯作者：
Broh, BA
影响因子：
9.1
作者：
ENTWISLE, DR;ALEXANDER, KL
通讯作者：
ALEXANDER, KL
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Chin, T;Phillips, M
通讯作者：
Phillips, M
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Dumais, SA
通讯作者：
Dumais, SA