Vocational Interventions for Individuals with ASD: Umbrella Review
Vocational Interventions for Individuals with ASD: Umbrella Review
复制标题
针对自闭症谱系障碍患者的职业干预：总体审查
DOI：
10.1007/s40489-023-00368-4
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Dragut, Eduard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tincani, Matt;Ji, Hyangeun;Upthegrove, Maddie;Garrison, Elizabeth;West, Michael;Hantula, Donald;Vucetic, Slobodan;Dragut, Eduard
与无残疾的成年人相比，患有自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）的成年人失业率高得不成比例。在这篇综述中，我们总结了ASD职业干预研究的31篇系统综述和荟萃分析的结果，其中包括287项初级干预研究。大多数初级研究集中在低技能工作任务的教学策略。相比之下，很少有初步研究审查干预措施，以改善更直接和有意义的就业措施，如工作成就，工资，工作时间，福利和工作满意度。超过60%的主要研究评估了行为或技术干预措施，审查之间的主要研究有很大的重叠。很少有主要研究探讨其他方法，包括全面的支持战略，住宿通常在工作场所，和战略教学求职。干预效果总体上是积极的;然而，许多综述的综述研究质量是可变的和低的，限制了对结果的解释。大多数综述报告了不完整的主要研究参与者人口统计学信息，使得在综述之外推广结果具有挑战性。我们的研究结果强调，需要更多地关注实际就业的结果指标，评估各种各样的干预措施，包括通常在工作场所发现的住宿，并需要评估全面的支持。评论质量低凸显了职业干预研究评论中提高方法严谨性的必要性。
Adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are disproportionately unemployed in comparison to adults without disabilities. In this umbrella review, we summarized the findings of 31 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of ASD vocational intervention research, encompassing 287 primary intervention studies. Most primary studies focused on strategies for teaching low-skill job tasks. In contrast, few primary studies examined interventions to improve more direct and meaningful measures of employment, such as job attainment, wages, hours worked, benefits, and job satisfaction. Over 60% of primary studies evaluated either behavioral or technology interventions, with a substantial overlap of primary studies between reviews. Few primary studies explored other approaches, including comprehensive support strategies, accommodations typically found in the workplace, and strategies for teaching job seeking. Intervention effects were generally positive; however, review study quality was variable and low for many reviews, constraining the interpretation of findings. Most reviews reported incomplete primary study participant demographic information, rendering it challenging to generalize findings outside of the reviews. Our results highlight the need for a greater focus on outcome measures indicative of actual employment, the evaluation of a greater variety of interventions, including accommodations typically found in the workplace, and the need to assess comprehensive support. Low review quality underscores the need for improved methodological rigor in reviews of vocational intervention research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Page MJ;McKenzie JE;Bossuyt PM;Boutron I;Hoffmann TC;Mulrow CD;Shamseer L;Tetzlaff JM;Akl EA;Brennan SE;Chou R;Glanville J;Grimshaw JM;Hróbjartsson A;Lalu MM;Li T;Loder EW;Mayo-Wilson E;McDonald S;McGuinness LA;Stewart LA;Thomas J;Tricco AC;Welch VA;Whiting P;Moher D
通讯作者：
Moher D
DOI：
10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131151
发表时间：
2010-01-01
期刊：
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 6
影响因子：
--
作者：
Vismara, Laurie A.;Rogers, Sally J.
通讯作者：
Rogers, Sally J.
DOI：
10.1352/1944-7558-119.1.64
发表时间：
2014-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Burgess, Sloane;Cimera, Robert E.
通讯作者：
Cimera, Robert E.
使用技术支持智力和发育障碍人士的就业相关成果：更新的荟萃分析
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Despoina Damianidou;M. Arthur;G. Lyons;M. Wehmeyer
通讯作者：
M. Wehmeyer
自闭症患者与非自闭症患者的社区就业：比较分析
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Derek K. Nord;R. Stancliffe;Kelly M. Nye;A. Hewitt
通讯作者：
A. Hewitt