Multiracial faces: How categorization affects memory at the boundaries of race.
Multiracial faces: How categorization affects memory at the boundaries of race.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01588.x
复制
发表时间：
2009-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ambady N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pauker K;Ambady N
单一种族和多种族的个体可能对种族有不同的概念化，从而对种族模糊有不同的处理方法。特别是，单一种族的人可能更有可能依赖于类别时，处理模糊的面孔，而多种族的人可能倾向于忽略这样的分类，由于减少的倾向，本质化的种族。我们比较了单亲（白色和亚洲）和双胞胎（亚洲/白色）个体的记忆模式。具体来说，我们检查了参与者对白色、亚洲人和标记为白色或亚洲人的双胞胎面孔的记忆。白色和亚洲参与者都依赖于这些标签，他们对被标记为内群体的面孔的记忆要比被标记为外群体的面孔好。双胞胎参与者对标签的依赖程度较低，总体上表现出更好的识别记忆。双胞胎参与者的记忆表现也与人类特征的本质主义观点高度相关。这种认知灵活性可能为birthorough个体提供适应功能，并有助于增强面部识别。
Monoracial and multiracial individuals are likely to have different conceptualizations of race and subsequently different approaches towards racial ambiguity. In particular, monoracial individuals may be more likely to rely on categories when processing ambiguous faces, whereas multiracial individuals may tend to ignore such categorizations due to a reduced tendency to essentialize race. We compared monoracial (White and Asian) and biracial (Asian/White) individuals’ memory patterns. Specifically, we examined participants’ memory for White, Asian, and biracial faces labeled as either White or Asian. Both White and Asian participants relied on the labels, remembering faces labeled as the in-group better than faces labeled as the out-group. Biracial participants relied less on the labels, exhibiting better recognition memory overall. Biracial participants’ memory performance was also highly correlated with a less essentialist view of human traits. This cognitive flexibility may serve an adaptive function for biracial individuals and contribute to enhanced facial recognition.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Locke, V;Macrae, CN;Eaton, JL
通讯作者：
Eaton, JL
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Castano, E;Yzerbyt, V;Seron, E
通讯作者：
Seron, E
影响因子：
4
作者：
Eberhardt, JL;Dasgupta, N;Banaszynski, TL
通讯作者：
Banaszynski, TL
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Hitlin, Steven;Brown, J. Scott;Elder, Glen H., Jr.
通讯作者：
Elder, Glen H., Jr.
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Levin, DT
通讯作者：
Levin, DT