Validation of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen Among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth and Young Adults.

Validation of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen Among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth and Young Adults.
复制标题

在跨性别和非二元青少年和年轻人中验证九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍筛查。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Jamie L. Reed
Jamie L. Reed
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Linsenmeyer;Hana F Zickgraf;Sarah Garwood;C. Lewis;Andrea Giedinghagen;Jamie L. Reed

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的
Purpose The purpose of the study was to provide initial evidence for the internal consistency and convergent validity of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) in a sample of transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) youth and young adults. Methods Returning patients at a Midwestern gender clinic (n=164) ages 12-23 completed the NIAS, sick, control, one stone, fat, food (SCOFF), patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) during their clinic visit. Age, sex assigned at birth, gender identity, weight, and height were also collected. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to establish the hypothesized three-factor structure of the NIAS in this sample. Relationships between the NIAS subscales and anthropometric data, SCOFF, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and sex assigned at birth were explored for convergent and divergent validity, and proposed screening cutoff scores were used to identify the prevalence of likely avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in this population. Results The three-factor structure of the NIAS was an excellent fit to the current data. Approximately one in five (22%) of the participants screened positive for ARFID. Approximately one in four participants scored above the picky eating (27.4%) or appetite (23.9%) cutoffs. Assigned female at birth participants scored significantly higher on the NIAS-Total, Appetite, and Fear subscales than those assigned male at birth. NIAS-Total was significantly related to all convergent validity variables other than age, with a moderate-strong correlation with other symptom screeners (SCOFF, PHQ-9, GAD-7), and a small negative correlation with body mass index percentile. Conclusions Evidence supports the NIAS as a valid measure to screen for ARFID among TGNB youth and young adults.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.05.006
发表时间: 2010-12
期刊: EATING BEHAVIORS
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Mascola, Anthony J.;Bryson, Susan W.;Agras, W. Stewart
通讯作者: Agras, W. Stewart