Plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography associated with the positive findings of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio

Plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography associated with the positive findings of fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio
复制标题

冠状动脉CT血管造影的斑块特征与血流储备分数和瞬时无波比阳性结果相关

DOI:
10.1007/s00380-020-01722-w
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Daida Hiroyuki
Daida Hiroyuki
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aoshima Chihiro;Fujimoto Shinichiro;Kawaguchi Yuko O.;Dohi Tomotaka;Kamo Yuki;Takamura Kazuhisa;Hiki Makoto;Kato Yoshiteru;Okai Iwao;Okazaki Shinya;Kumamaru Kanako K.;Aoki Shigeki;Daida Hiroyuki

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

分数血流储备(FFR)和瞬时无波比(iFR)在确定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的血运重建指征方面是有用的。虽然FFR和iFR的不一致约占20%,但这一原因尚未得到很好的确定。我们调查了患者的背景和冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的特征,不仅显示FFR和iFR阳性,而且FFR≤0.8和iFR≤0.89之间也存在不一致。方法对83例105条血管进行连续治疗,其中1条心外膜主要血管狭窄≥2mm的血管狭窄30-90%,在随后的90天内行FFR和iFR,其中疑似CAD的行CCTA。采用基于每位患者和每条血管的logistic回归分析,评估影响FFR和iFR阳性结果的因素,以及FFR和iFR之间的不一致性。结果ffr -阳性42例(40.0%),ifr -阳性34例(32.3%)。21例患者中有22条血管(21.0%)FFR≤0.8与iFR≤0.89不一致。在多因素logistic分析中,LAD (OR 3.55; 95%CI 1.20-11.71;p= 0.0217)和管腔容积/心肌重量(L/M)比(OR 0.93; 0.86-0.99,p= 0.0290)是ffr阳性结果的显著预测因子。对于ifr阳性结果,LAD (OR 3.86; 95%CI 1.12-13.31;p= 0.0236)是唯一显著的预测因子。在FFR≤0.8和iFR≤0.89组(15支,14.3%),阳性重构(PR) (OR 5.03, 95%CI 1.23-20.48,p= 0.0205)是显著预测因子。在FFR≤0.8和iFR≤0.89组(7只血管,6.7%),无显著预测因子。结论在CCTA特征方面,低l /Mratio是ffr阳性结果的相关预测因子。在FFR和iFR不一致的FFR阳性和iFR阴性患者中,PR是显著的预测因子。
BackgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are useful in determining indications for revascularization of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although the discordance of FFR and iFR was noted in approximately 20%, this cause has not been well established. We investigated patient background and features on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) showing not only FFR- and iFR-positive findings but also discordance between FFR ≤ 0.8 and iFR ≤ 0.89.MethodsSubjects were consecutively treated in 83 cases with 105 vessels in which stenosis of 30–90% was detected at one vessel of at least 2 mm or more in the major epicardial vessels and FFR and iFR was performed within subsequent 90 days, among suspected CAD which underwent CCTA. The factors affecting not only FFR- and iFR-positive findings, respectively, but also discordance between FFR and iFR was evaluated using logistic regression analysis on per-patient and per-vessel basis.ResultsFFR- and iFR-positive findings were observed in 42 vessels (40.0%) and 34 vessels (32.3%), respectively. Discordance between FFR ≤ 0.8 and iFR ≤ 0.89 was observed in 22 vessels (21.0%) of 21 patients. In multivariate logistic analysis, LAD (OR 3.55; 95%CI 1.20–11.71;p= 0.0217) and lumen volume/myocardial weight (L/M) ratio (OR 0.93; 0.86–0.99,p= 0.0290) were significant predictors for FFR-positive findings. For iFR-positive findings, LAD (OR 3.86; 95%CI 1.12–13.31;p= 0.0236) was only significant predictor. In FFR ≤ 0.8 and iFR > 0.89 group (15 vessels, 14.3%), positive remodeling (PR) (OR 5.03, 95%CI 1.23–20.48,p= 0.0205) was significant predictor. In FFR > 0.8 and iFR ≤ 0.89 group (7 vessels, 6.7%), there were no significant predictors.ConclusionOn CCTA characteristics, a relevant predictor for FFR-positive findings included lowL/Mratio. PR was significant predictor in FFR-positive, iFR-negative patients among those with discordance between the FFR and iFR.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.079
发表时间: 2018-06-05
影响因子: 24
作者:
Chang HJ;Lin FY;Lee SE;Andreini D;Bax J;Cademartiri F;Chinnaiyan K;Chow BJW;Conte E;Cury RC;Feuchtner G;Hadamitzky M;Kim YJ;Leipsic J;Maffei E;Marques H;Plank F;Pontone G;Raff GL;van Rosendael AR;Villines TC;Weirich HG;Al'Aref SJ;Baskaran L;Cho I;Danad I;Han D;Heo R;Lee JH;Rivzi A;Stuijfzand WJ;Gransar H;Lu Y;Sung JM;Park HB;Berman DS;Budoff MJ;Samady H;Shaw LJ;Stone PH;Virmani R;Narula J;Min JK
通讯作者: Min JK
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.01.013
发表时间: 2010-03-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Achenbach, Stephan;Boehmer, Kerstin;Marwan, Mohamed
通讯作者: Marwan, Mohamed
血管造影中间冠状动脉狭窄中血流储备分数/瞬时无波比率不一致
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
影响因子: --
作者:
Christopher M. Cook;A. Jeremias;R. Petraco;S. Sen;S. Nijjer;M. Shun;Y. Ahmad;Guus A de Waard;T. P. van de Hoef;M. Echavarría;M. V. van Lavieren;Rasha Al Lamee;Y. Kikuta;Y. Shiono;A. Buch;M. Meuwissen;I. Danad;P. Knaapen;A. Maehara;B. Koo;G. Mintz;J. Escaned;G. Stone;D. Francis;J. Mayet;J. Piek;N. van Royen;J. Davies
通讯作者: J. Davies
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.060
发表时间: 2014-04-08
影响因子: 24
作者:
Jeremias, Allen;Maehara, Akiko;Stone, Gregg W.
通讯作者: Stone, Gregg W.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.002
发表时间: 2015-01
影响因子: 14
作者:
Park, Hyung-Bok;Heo, Ran;Hartaigh, Briain O.;Cho, Iksung;Gransar, Heidi;Nakazato, Ryo;Leipsic, Jonathon;Mancini, G. B. John;Koo, Bon-Kwon;Otake, Hiromasa;Budoff, Matthew J.;Berman, Daniel S.;Erglis, Andrejs;Chang, Hyuk-Jae;Min, James K.
通讯作者: Min, James K.