Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation
Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation
复制标题
负责任的人工智能和道德责任：共同的欣赏
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Daniel W. Tigard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daniel W. Tigard
责任是人工智能(AI)和机器人伦理中最广泛使用的流行语之一。然而，当这个术语用于这些重要的技术领域时，往往仍然没有得到证实。事实上，像“负责任的人工智能”和“负责任的机器人”这样的概念听起来可能很有吸引力，因为它们似乎传达了一种道德良善或伦理认同的感觉，从而激发了自我监管、社会接受或政治正确性的心理联系。为了让人工智能和伦理以真正和谐的方式走到一起，我们需要努力建立共同的欣赏。在这篇评论中，我细分了三种不同的术语，并引用了分析伦理学文献中的见解，作为一种手段，以提供对新兴技术中道德责任的强有力的理解。虽然我不想指责任何一方不正确的使用，但我希望人工智能和伦理学的研究人员能够共同更好地理解和发展技术领域的责任概念。
Responsibility is among the most widespread buzzwords in the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. Yet, the term often remains unsubstantiated when employed in these important technological domains. Indeed, notions like ‘responsible AI’ and ‘responsible robotics’ may sound appealing, for they seem to convey a sense of moral goodness or ethical approval, thereby inciting psychological connections to self-regulation, social acceptance, or political correctness. For AI and ethics to come together in truly harmonious ways, we will need to work toward establishing a common appreciation. In this commentary, I breakdown three varieties of the term and invoke insights from the analytic ethics literature as a means of offering a robust understanding of moral responsibility in emerging technology. While I do not wish to accuse any parties of incorrect usage, my hope is that together researchers in AI and ethics can be better positioned to appreciate and to develop notions of responsibility for technological domains.
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Martin, Kirsten
通讯作者：
Martin, Kirsten