TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review.
TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review.
复制标题
自我报告的久坐行为工具（TASST）开发，比较和评估自我报告工具的分类学框架：内容分析和系统评价。
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013844
复制
发表时间：
2017-04-08
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Seniors USP Team
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dall PM;Coulter EH;Fitzsimons CF;Skelton DA;Chastin S;Seniors USP Team
久坐行为（SB）具有明显的有害健康后果，但在测量的最佳实践上没有达成共识。本研究的目的是确定最佳的自我报告工具的人口监测SB，使用一个系统的框架。一个框架，TAxonomy的自我报告久坐行为工具（TASST），包括四个领域（类型的评估，回忆期，时间单位和评估期），开发了一个系统的库存现有的工具的基础上。通过对报告SB的研究进行系统回顾并追溯到原始描述，完成了库存。然后，对这些工具的准确性和灵敏度变化的系统性审查映射到TASST域。通过EBSCO、参考清单和专家意见进行了系统检索。该清单包括测量成人SB的工具，这些工具可以在一次会议上自我完成，并排除了测量特定人群或背景下SB的工具。系统性综述包括报告SB的客观测量准确性和/或对清单中工具变化的敏感性的研究。系统性综述最初确定了32种不同的工具（141个问题），用于开发TASST框架。22项研究评估的准确性和/或变化的敏感性，仅代表8个类群。将SB评估为行为的总和并使用前一天的回忆是现有工具中最有前途的功能。所有现有工具的准确性都很差，低估和高估了SB。尽管证据有限，但将现有SB工具映射到TASST框架上，可以就监测工具最有前途的功能提出明智的建议，确定SB监测工具未来研究和开发应重点关注的方面。国际系统性综述前瞻性登记（PROPSPERO）/CRD 42014009851。
Sedentary behaviour (SB) has distinct deleterious health outcomes, yet there is no consensus on best practice for measurement. This study aimed to identify the optimal self-report tool for population surveillance of SB, using a systematic framework. A framework, TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST), consisting of four domains (type of assessment, recall period, temporal unit and assessment period), was developed based on a systematic inventory of existing tools. The inventory was achieved through a systematic review of studies reporting SB and tracing back to the original description. A systematic review of the accuracy and sensitivity to change of these tools was then mapped against TASST domains. Systematic searches were conducted via EBSCO, reference lists and expert opinion. The inventory included tools measuring SB in adults that could be self-completed at one sitting, and excluded tools measuring SB in specific populations or contexts. The systematic review included studies reporting on the accuracy against an objective measure of SB and/or sensitivity to change of a tool in the inventory. The systematic review initially identified 32 distinct tools (141 questions), which were used to develop the TASST framework. Twenty-two studies evaluated accuracy and/or sensitivity to change representing only eight taxa. Assessing SB as a sum of behaviours and using a previous day recall were the most promising features of existing tools. Accuracy was poor for all existing tools, with underestimation and overestimation of SB. There was a lack of evidence about sensitivity to change. Despite the limited evidence, mapping existing SB tools onto the TASST framework has enabled informed recommendations to be made about the most promising features for a surveillance tool, identified aspects on which future research and development of SB surveillance tools should focus. International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROPSPERO)/CRD42014009851.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
18.4
作者：
Chau, Josephine Y.;Grunseit, Anne;Van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
通讯作者：
Van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
DOI：
10.1249/mss.0b013e31821b94f7
发表时间：
2011-11-01
期刊：
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Gardiner, Paul A.;Clark, Bronwyn K.;Owen, Neville
通讯作者：
Owen, Neville
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Banks, Emily;Jorm, Louisa;Bauman, Adrian
通讯作者：
Bauman, Adrian
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Curry, Whitney Babakus;Thompson, Janice L.
通讯作者：
Thompson, Janice L.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Gennuso, Keith R.;Matthews, Charles E.;Colbert, Lisa H.
通讯作者：
Colbert, Lisa H.