A hierarchical Bayesian model to find brain-behaviour associations in incomplete data sets.
A hierarchical Bayesian model to find brain-behaviour associations in incomplete data sets.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118854
复制
发表时间:
2022-04-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Mourao-Miranda J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ferreira FS;Mihalik A;Adams RA;Ashburner J;Mourao-Miranda J
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) and its regularised versions have been widely used in the neuroimaging community to uncover multivariate associations between two data modalities (e.g., brain imaging and behaviour). However, these methods have inherent limitations: (1) statistical inferences about the associations are often not robust; (2) the associations within each data modality are not modelled; (3) missing values need to be imputed or removed. Group Factor Analysis (GFA) is a hierarchical model that addresses the first two limitations by providing Bayesian inference and modelling modality-specific associations. Here, we propose an extension of GFA that handles missing data, and highlight that GFA can be used as a predictive model. We applied GFA to synthetic and real data consisting of brain connectivity and non-imaging measures from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). In synthetic data, GFA uncovered the underlying shared and specific factors and predicted correctly the non-observed data modalities in complete and incomplete data sets. In the HCP data, we identified four relevant shared factors, capturing associations between mood, alcohol and drug use, cognition, demographics and psychopathological measures and the default mode, frontoparietal control, dorsal and ventral networks and insula, as well as two factors describing associations within brain connectivity. In addition, GFA predicted a set of non-imaging measures from brain connectivity. These findings were consistent in complete and incomplete data sets, and replicated previous findings in the literature. GFA is a promising tool that can be used to uncover associations between and within multiple data modalities in benchmark datasets (such as, HCP), and easily extended to more complex models to solve more challenging tasks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Lee WH;Moser DA;Ing A;Doucet GE;Frangou S
通讯作者:
Frangou S
影响因子:
3
作者:
Sui, Jing;Adali, Tuelay;Yu, Qingbao;Chen, Jiayu;Calhoun, Vince D.
通讯作者:
Calhoun, Vince D.
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Drysdale AT;Grosenick L;Downar J;Dunlop K;Mansouri F;Meng Y;Fetcho RN;Zebley B;Oathes DJ;Etkin A;Schatzberg AF;Sudheimer K;Keller J;Mayberg HS;Gunning FM;Alexopoulos GS;Fox MD;Pascual-Leone A;Voss HU;Casey BJ;Dubin MJ;Liston C
通讯作者:
Liston C
DOI:
10.1109/tnnls.2014.2376974
发表时间:
2015-09-01
影响因子:
10.4
作者:
Klami, Arto;Virtanen, Seppo;Kaski, Samuel
通讯作者:
Kaski, Samuel
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Mihalik, Agoston;Ferreira, Fabio S.;Mourao-Miranda, Janaina
通讯作者:
Mourao-Miranda, Janaina