Paradoxes Of Knowledge, Management and Knowledge Management in Africa: An Editorial Introduction
Paradoxes Of Knowledge, Management and Knowledge Management in Africa: An Editorial Introduction
复制标题
非洲知识、管理和知识管理的悖论:社论简介
DOI:
10.1108/jkm-01-2020-782
复制
发表时间:
2020-01
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Peter Ping Li
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miguel Pina e Cunha;David B. Zoogah;Geoffrey Wood;Peter Ping Li
The discipline of management and organization has been presented as being rife with paradox. Cameron and Quinn (1988) referred to a paradox as a concept embracing contradiction and the clashing of ideas, “contradictory, mutually exclusive elements that are present and operate equally at the same time” (p. 2). For Van de Ven and Poole (1988, p. 22), paradox refers to “the real or apparent contradiction between equally well-based assumptions or conclusions”. More recently, Smith and Lewis (2011, p. 382) deemed paradox as “contradictory yet interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time”. A burgeoning literature on paradox, plurality, contradiction and dialectics (Cunha et al., 2020; Cunha and Putnam, 2019; Putnam et al., 2016; Schad et al., 2016) has mostly treated the theme in accordance to traditions of East and West and even from disciplinary areas as distant as quantum theory (Hahn and Knight, 2019). Yet, we have until now failed to systematically analyze paradox lessons from African organizations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
M. Cunha;Linda L. Putnam
通讯作者:
M. Cunha;Linda L. Putnam
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
T. Jackson
通讯作者:
T. Jackson
DOI:
10.1108/13673271011059518
发表时间:
2010-07
期刊:
J. Knowl. Manag.
影响因子:
--
作者:
C. J. Kruger;Roy D. Johnson
通讯作者:
C. J. Kruger;Roy D. Johnson
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Pina e Cunha, Miguel;Gomes, Emanuel;Rego, Armenio
通讯作者:
Rego, Armenio
DOI:
10.1108/13673270710738889
发表时间:
2007-04
期刊:
J. Knowl. Manag.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Zhi Ang;P. Massingham
通讯作者:
Zhi Ang;P. Massingham