Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake.
Citation analysis did not provide a reliable assessment of core outcome set uptake.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.003
复制
发表时间:
2017-06
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Williamson PR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Barnes KL;Kirkham JJ;Clarke M;Williamson PR
The aim of the study was to evaluate citation analysis as an approach to measuring core outcome set (COS) uptake, by assessing whether the number of citations for a COS report could be used as a surrogate measure of uptake of the COS by clinical trialists. Citation data were obtained for COS reports published before 2010 in five disease areas (systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, eczema, sepsis and critical care, and female sexual dysfunction). Those publications identified as a report of a clinical trial were examined to identify whether or not all outcomes in the COS were measured in the trial. Clinical trials measuring the relevant COS made up a small proportion of the total number of citations for COS reports. Not all trials citing a COS report measured all the recommended outcomes. Some trials cited the COS reports for other reasons, including the definition of a condition or other trial design issues addressed by the COS report. Although citation data can be readily accessed, it should not be assumed that the citing of a COS report indicates that a trial has measured the recommended COS. Alternative methods for assessing COS uptake are needed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
14.2
作者:
Schmitt, Jochen;Langan, Sinead;Williams, Hywel C.
通讯作者:
Williams, Hywel C.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Gargon E;Gurung B;Medley N;Altman DG;Blazeby JM;Clarke M;Williamson PR
通讯作者:
Williamson PR
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Falagas, Matthew E.;Pitsouni, Eleni I.;Pappas, Georgios
通讯作者:
Pappas, Georgios
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Clarke M;Williamson P
通讯作者:
Williamson P
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Kirkham JJ;Boers M;Tugwell P;Clarke M;Williamson PR
通讯作者:
Williamson PR