Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?
Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?
复制标题
明尼苏达州青少年烟草预防计划关闭前后青少年吸烟行为是否发生变化？
DOI：
10.1093/ntr/ntp124
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Erickson,DarinJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alesci,NinaL;Forster,JeanL;Erickson,DarinJ
前言以前没有研究记录全面控烟和撤资对青少年吸烟的影响。这项研究测试了以青年为重点的明尼苏达州青年烟草预防倡议(MYTPI)及其关闭对青年吸烟的影响，并确定这些影响是否因年龄而不同。方法明尼苏达州青少年社区队列是一项以人群为基础的观察性研究，旨在评估MYTPI。样本包括明尼苏达州基线年龄在12-16岁的青年队列(N= 3,636)和其他六个中西部州的对照组(n= 605)。一年两次的调查评估了从2000年10月，即MYTPI推出5个月后，到2005年10月，关闭2年后的青年吸烟情况。调整后的分段线性轨迹预测吸烟阶段(在1-6个连续体上测量)，比较明尼苏达州与对照组在每个基线年龄队列的MYTPI(斜率1)和关闭后(斜率2)期间的吸烟阶段。然后，分析通过将截距集中在16岁来比较基线年龄队列之间的差异。结果明尼苏达州和对照组之间的吸烟阶段斜率都没有不同，显示出MYTPI或关机的时期效应。然而，具有青少年早期MYTPI经验的年轻队列比相同年龄的老年队列吸烟更少。16岁的平均吸烟阶段与最年轻的(2.04岁)和最大的(2.46岁)年龄组相差近半个阶段。讨论这项研究没有提供MYTPI或其关闭的时期效应的证据。设计限制，国家或后MYTPI持续的全州烟草控制努力，或计划缺陷可以解释这些发现。
IntroductionNo previous studies document the effects of both comprehensive tobacco control and its defunding on youth smoking. This study tests the effect of the youth-focused Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative (MYTPI) and its shutdown on youth smoking and determines whether these effects differed by age.MethodsThe Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort is a population-based, observational study designed to evaluate the MYTPI. The sample included cohorts of youth aged 12–16 years at baseline in Minnesota (N= 3,636) and a comparison group in six other Midwestern states (n= 605). Biannual surveys assessed youth smoking from October 2000, 5 months after the MYTPI launch, through October 2005, 2 years postshutdown. Adjusted piecewise linear trajectories predicted smoking stage (measured on a 1–6 continuum) comparing Minnesota with a comparison group during the MYTPI (Slope 1) and postshutdown (Slope 2) for each baseline age cohort. Analysis then compared baseline age cohorts with each other by centering their intercepts on age 16.ResultsNeither slope of smoking stage differed between Minnesota and comparison groups, showing no period effects for the MYTPI or shutdown. However, younger cohorts, with early teen experience of MYTPI, smoked less than older cohorts by the same age. Mean smoking stage at age 16 differed by almost a half stage from the youngest (2.04) to the oldest (2.46) age cohort.DiscussionThe study offers no evidence of period effects for the MYTPI or its shutdown. Design limitations, national or continued post-MYTPI statewide tobacco control efforts, or program flaws could explain the findings.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
158.5
作者：
Fichtenberg, CM;Glantz, SA
通讯作者：
Glantz, SA
同伴和父母对青少年早期吸烟进展影响的潜在增长曲线分析。
DOI：
10.1037/0278-6133.23.6.612
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
影响因子：
--
作者：
Simons-Morton,Bruce;Chen,Rusan;Abroms,Lorien;Haynie,DeniseL
通讯作者：
Haynie,DeniseL
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Niederdeppe, J.;Farrelly, M. C.;Davis, K. C.
通讯作者：
Davis, K. C.
1996 年至 1999 年马萨诸塞州青少年烟草使用量减少：烟草控制有效性的证据
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
S. Soldz;T. W. Clark;E. Stewart;C. Celebucki;D. Walker
通讯作者：
D. Walker
了解青少年吸烟轨迹的生态方法：问题和前景。
影响因子：
6
作者：
P. Wilcox
通讯作者：
P. Wilcox