Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007
复制
发表时间：
2021-03
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Stevens A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Garritty C;Gartlehner G;Nussbaumer-Streit B;King VJ;Hamel C;Kamel C;Affengruber L;Stevens A
制定方法指南，以支持进行Cochrane内外的快速审查(RR)，以响应为决策目的而及时合成证据的请求，包括高度优先的紧急健康问题。临时建议是通过对基本证据的范围划分审查、进行的主要方法研究以及向来自20个Cochrane实体的119名代表发送的调查而确定的，这些代表被要求在审查进行的各个阶段对RR方法进行评级和排名。对RR方法有专门知识的人之间的讨论进一步提供了所附理由的建议清单。基于63名受访者的调查结果(53%的回复率)，提出了26项RR方法建议，这些方法的一致性程度为高或中等，或者在没有这种一致意见的情况下得分最高。在可能的情况下，重点介绍建议如何与系统评价的Cochrane方法指南保持一致。Cochrane快速审查方法小组为支持RRS的实施提供了新的临时指导。由于目前缺乏某些RR方法捷径的可用证据，最佳实践受到限制，因此在评估其他简化方法时，需要更新本指南。
To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority. Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided. Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted. The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Peterson K;Floyd N;Ferguson L;Christensen V;Helfand M
通讯作者：
Helfand M
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-5-56
发表时间：
2010-07-19
期刊：
Implementation science : IS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ganann R;Ciliska D;Thomas H
通讯作者：
Thomas H
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Garritty CM;Norris SL;Moher D
通讯作者：
Moher D
知识经纪是否可以提高快速审查建议的质量？研究前后。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Moore G;Redman S;D'Este C;Makkar S;Turner T
通讯作者：
Turner T
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
Spry, Carolyn;Mierzwinski-Urban, Monika
通讯作者：
Mierzwinski-Urban, Monika