Stereoisomeric selectivity in the endocrine-disrupting potential of cypermethrin using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico assays.
Stereoisomeric selectivity in the endocrine-disrupting potential of cypermethrin using in vitro, in vivo, and in silico assays.
复制标题
使用体外、体内和计算机分析测定氯氰菊酯内分泌干扰潜力的立体异构选择性。
DOI:
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125389
复制
发表时间:
2021-02
影响因子:
13.6
通讯作者:
Sijia Gu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Quan Zhang;Shuqing Yu;Xiaoyang Chen;Lili Fu;Wei Dai;Sijia Gu
Despite the ubiquity of cypermethrin (CYP) stereoisomers in environment biota, the stereoisomeric selectivity of endocrine-disrupting potency of α-CYP, β-CYP, and θ-CYP has not been well studied. In this study, dual-luciferase reporter gene assays were adopted to analyze their potential endocrine-disrupting effects via four receptors (ERα, GRα, MR and RXR). The results showed that α-CYP was antagonistic to ERα, GRα, and MR with RIC20of 9.1 × 10−7, 7.6 × 10−7, and 1.0 × 10−6M, respectively. β-CYP exhibited only ERα-mediated agonistic activity with a REC20of 2.1 × 10−6M. None of the CYP stereoisomers interacted with RXR. Molecular docking indicated that α-CYP had the strongest binding capacity to GRα among the compounds. The expression levels of steroid hormone-related genes in human adrenocortical carcinoma (H295R) cells displayed that all three compounds inhibited the transcription of3-βHSD,indicating the block of turning cholesterol into different hormones. Both α-CYP and β-CYP upregulated genes encoding estrogen- and aldosterone-forming enzymes including17-βHSD, CYP19, STAR,andCYP11B2. Mortality and malformation toxicity assays in zebrafish embryos revealed that the order of toxicity was α-CYP > β-CYP > θ-CYP. Our results indicated that α-CYP may pose the strongest endocrine-disrupting effects. The data provided here will be helpful to systematically understand stereoisomeric selectivity in the endocrine-disrupting effects of cypermethrin.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
Chao Xu;W. Tu;C. Lou;Yingying Hong;Mei-rong Zhao
通讯作者:
Chao Xu;W. Tu;C. Lou;Yingying Hong;Mei-rong Zhao
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Sanderson, JT;Boerma, J;van den Berg, M
通讯作者:
van den Berg, M
DOI:
10.1016/j.cbpc.2020.108894
发表时间:
2020-09
期刊:
Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP
影响因子:
--
作者:
Juanli Lu;Qin Wu;Qing Yang;Guangyu Li;Ruiqi Wang;Yingxin Liu;Cunyu Duan;Shiyun Duan;Xuanyi He;Zhuo-yan Huang;Xitian Peng;Wei Yan;Jinhua Jiang
通讯作者:
Juanli Lu;Qin Wu;Qing Yang;Guangyu Li;Ruiqi Wang;Yingxin Liu;Cunyu Duan;Shiyun Duan;Xuanyi He;Zhuo-yan Huang;Xitian Peng;Wei Yan;Jinhua Jiang
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Quan Zhang;Chang Yu;Lili Fu;Sijia Gu;Cui Wang
通讯作者:
Quan Zhang;Chang Yu;Lili Fu;Sijia Gu;Cui Wang
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Julin Yuan;Jianlin Guo;Haiyang Wang;A. Guo;Qingping Lian;Z. Gu
通讯作者:
Julin Yuan;Jianlin Guo;Haiyang Wang;A. Guo;Qingping Lian;Z. Gu