What’s holding back empirical research into organizational capabilities? Remedies for common problems
What’s holding back empirical research into organizational capabilities? Remedies for common problems
复制标题
是什么阻碍了对组织能力的实证研究?
DOI:
10.1177/1476127014565988
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Gianmario Verona
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Grant;Gianmario Verona
Recent commentary on state of research in strategic management points to excessive attention to theory development and deficiencies in the empirical testing of these theories (Bettis, 2012; Miller and Tsang, 2010; Oxley et al., 2010). This criticism is especially pertinent to research into organizational capabilities, where empirical verification of constructs and relationships has lagged far behind conceptual and theoretical developments (Arend and Bromiley, 2009; Leiblein, 2011; Newbert, 2007). Despite a growing methodological sophistication in using statistical tests to ensure some dimensions of validity, fundamental impediments to reliability and validity in identifying and measuring organizational capabilities remain unrecognized and unresolved. In this article, we use a survey of the empirical literature on organizational capability to identify the principal problems that have impeded empirical research, and, for each problem, we offer recommendations for either resolving the problem or ameliorating its negative impact. Separate problems arise in each of the two main categories of empirical research into capabilities. In quantitative studies (both cross-sectional and panel sampling), the problems relate mainly to measurement; in qualitative, case study research, the problems relate mainly to identification. The Appendix describes our methodology in identifying and coding published articles on organizational capabilities.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Harbir Singh
通讯作者:
Harbir Singh