A systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for affect intolerance/sensitivity.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for affect intolerance/sensitivity.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.brat.2020.103746
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Yeh GY
Yeh GY
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kraemer KM;Luberto CM;Hall DL;Ngo LH;Yeh GY

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

情感不耐受/敏感,定义为一个人对情感状态的敏感或无法容忍,是一个涉及多种精神病理学发展和维持的跨诊断过程。正念和接受干预被认为可以改善影响不容忍/敏感性;然而,迄今为止还没有对这一研究进行定量综合。截至2018年11月,共搜索了7个电子数据库。对一系列随机效应模型计算对冲系数的g值、95%置信区间、p值和q值。25项研究(合计N = 1,778)符合资格标准,纳入定性综合(N = 22纳入荟萃分析)。从干预前到干预后,正念和接受干预对改善情绪不耐受/敏感性有小而显著的影响(赫奇斯的g =−)。37, 95% ci =−。52 ~−。23, p <.001),效果维持长达6个月(Hedges的g =−。35, 95% ci =−。61 ~−。09, p < 0.01)。与积极对照组相比,不积极对照组的影响要大得多。干预时长(< 8次vs.≥8次)、干预类型(正念vs.接受)或样本类型(临床vs.非临床)没有发现显著的效应大小差异。正念和接受干预适度改善影响不耐受/敏感性。
Affect intolerance/sensitivity, defined as one’s sensitivity to, or inability to tolerate, affective states, is a transdiagnostic process implicated in the development and maintenance of numerous forms of psychopathology. Mindfulness and acceptance interventions are posited to improve affect intolerance/sensitivity; however, there has been no quantitative synthesis of this research to date. Seven electronic databases were searched up until November 2018. Hedges’ g values, 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Q-values were calculated for a series of random-effects models. Twenty-five studies (pooled N = 1,778) met eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis (n = 22 included in the meta-analysis). There was a small, significant effect of mindfulness and acceptance interventions on improving affect intolerance/sensitivity from pre- to post-intervention (Hedges’ g = −.37, 95% CI = −.52 to −.23, p <.001), with effects maintained up to 6-months (Hedges’ g = −.35, 95% CI = −.61 to −.09, p < .01). There was a significantly larger effect for studies with inactive compared to active controls. No significant effect size differences were found for intervention length (< 8 vs. ≥ 8 sessions), intervention type (mindfulness vs. acceptance) or sample type (clinical vs. non-clinical). Mindfulness and acceptance interventions modestly improve affect intolerance/sensitivity.
DOI: 10.5127/jep.041714
发表时间: 2015-01-01
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L.;Chapman, Alexander L.;Turner, Brianna J.
通讯作者: Turner, Brianna J.
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-013-9359-0
发表时间: 2013-12-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Bardeen, Joseph R.;Fergus, Thomas A.;Orcutt, Holly K.
通讯作者: Orcutt, Holly K.
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.544
发表时间: 2007-11-01
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Anderson, Nicole D.;Lau, Mark A.;Bishop, Scott R.
通讯作者: Bishop, Scott R.
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s73864
发表时间: 2015-01-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Chan, Roxane Raffin;Giardino, Nicholas;Larson, Janet L.
通讯作者: Larson, Janet L.
正念训练减少了女性肠易激综合症的严重程度:一项随机对照试验的结果。
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.184
发表时间: 2011-09
期刊: The American journal of gastroenterology
影响因子: --
作者:
Gaylord SA;Palsson OS;Garland EL;Faurot KR;Coble RS;Mann JD;Frey W;Leniek K;Whitehead WE
通讯作者: Whitehead WE