Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering
Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering
复制标题
反身原则作为发展工程伦理推理的有效方法
DOI：
10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
A. Brightman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Beever;A. Brightman
向工科学生教授伦理学的一个重要目标是提高他们在工程实践中做出合理的伦理决策的能力：这个目标符合专业工程组织规定的伦理规范。虽然工程教育者探索了广泛的伦理学教学方法，但发展伦理推理技能的令人满意的模式还没有被广泛采用。在这篇文章中，我们认为以原则主义为基础的伦理推理方法是唯一适合工程伦理教育的方法。反身性原则主义是一种伦理决策的方法，它侧重于在具体案例的背景下，内化四个核心伦理原则的具体、平衡和正当的反思性和迭代过程。在工程学中，这种方法为伦理推理提供了结构，同时允许通过规范灵活地适应不同的上下文。反身性原则主义与工程学科中流行和熟悉的推理方法以及工程伦理教育的目标很好地结合在一起。
An important goal of teaching ethics to engineering students is to enhance their ability to make well-reasoned ethical decisions in their engineering practice: a goal in line with the stated ethical codes of professional engineering organizations. While engineering educators have explored a wide range of methodologies for teaching ethics, a satisfying model for developing ethical reasoning skills has not been adopted broadly. In this paper we argue that a principlist-based approach to ethical reasoning is uniquely suited to engineering ethics education. Reflexive Principlism is an approach to ethical decision-making that focuses on internalizing a reflective and iterative process of specification, balancing, and justification of four core ethical principles in the context of specific cases. In engineering, that approach provides structure to ethical reasoning while allowing the flexibility for adaptation to varying contexts through specification. Reflexive Principlism integrates well with the prevalent and familiar methodologies of reasoning within the engineering disciplines as well as with the goals of engineering ethics education.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
J. Haidt
通讯作者：
J. Haidt