Intestinal permeability in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intestinal permeability in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
人类非酒精性脂肪性肝病的肠道通透性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1111/liv.14696
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Koek GH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
De Munck TJI;Xu P;Verwijs HJA;Masclee AAM;Jonkers D;Verbeek J;Koek GH
The gut‐liver axis is considered to play a critical role in the development and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The integrity of the epithelial barrier is crucial to protect the liver against the invasion of microbial products from the gut, although its exact role in NAFLD onset and progression is not clear. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies that addressed the intestinal permeability (IP) in association with NAFLD presence or severity as defined by the presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and the degree of steatosis, hepatic inflammation or fibrosis. A total of 14 studies were eligible for inclusion. Studies investigating IP in adult (n = 6) and paediatric (n = 8) NAFLD showed similar results. Thirteen of the included studies focussed on small IP, two studies on whole gut permeability and none on colonic permeability. In the pooled analysis, NAFLD patients showed an increased small intestinal permeability compared to healthy controls based on dual sugar tests (standardized mean difference 0.79, 95% CI 0.49‐1.08) and serum zonulin levels (standardized mean difference 1.04 ng/mL, 95% CI 0.40‐1.68). No clear difference in IP was observed between simple steatosis and NASH patients. Furthermore, whole gut and small intestinal permeability increased with the degree of hepatic steatosis in 4/4 studies, while no association with hepatic inflammation or fibrosis was observed. Based on the limited number of studies available, IP appears to be increased in NAFLD patients compared to healthy controls and is associated with the degree of hepatic steatosis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
15.8
作者:
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者:
PRISMA Group
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
Cakir, Murat;Isbilen, Ayse Aksel;Kaya, Gulay
通讯作者:
Kaya, Gulay
影响因子:
24.5
作者:
Camilleri, Michael
通讯作者:
Camilleri, Michael
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Loffredo, Lorenzo;Zicari, Anna Maria;Nobili, Valerio
通讯作者:
Nobili, Valerio
DOI:
10.1152/ajpgi.00330.2013
发表时间:
2014-01-01
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Pijls, Kirsten E.;Koek, Ger H.;Jonkers, Daisy M. A. E.
通讯作者:
Jonkers, Daisy M. A. E.