Evaluation of a peer‐led self‐management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You
Evaluation of a peer‐led self‐management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You
复制标题
对同伴主导的自我管理教育计划 PEP Talk 的评估：糖尿病、健康足部和您
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
J. Greene
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Woodbury;Mariam Botros;J. Kuhnke;J. Greene
PEP（Peer Education Programme）Talk：Diabetes，Healthy Feet and You是一个由同伴领导的自我管理计划，旨在解决糖尿病及其并发症日益普遍的问题，以及有限的医疗保健资金。该方案的评价，它如何可能位于公共卫生的角度和潜在的桥梁，其在加拿大和世界各地的社区实施，提出。该方案包括在加拿大10个省的12个社区由志愿者同行领导人和保健专业人员举办的讲习班;通过每月的辅导电话会议、在线提示和讨论板对话向志愿者提供支持。开发了一个门户网站，供小组、志愿人员和社区参与者使用。研讨会课程是根据糖尿病足部护理和自我管理最佳实践指南开发的。社区参与者回答了研讨会前和研讨会后的陈述，这些陈述表明学习发生了，正如正确回答的陈述数量增加所示。与会者对讲习班的反馈是积极的。在电话随访中，97%的受访者表示已经改变了他们的足部自我管理行为。根据网站访问量，该门户网站的使用率很高，但在社区参与者登记方面没有预期的那么高。建议广泛提供这一方案，使其适合社区的具体需要，并进行进一步的评价。
PEP (Peer Education Programme) Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You is a peer‐led self‐management programme developed to address the problems of growing prevalence of diabetes and its complications, and limited health care dollars. An evaluation of the programme, how it might be situated within a public health perspective and potential bridges for its implementation in communities throughout Canada and worldwide, are presented. The programme consisted of workshops that were conducted by volunteer peer leaders and health care professionals in 12 communities in 10 Canadian provinces; the volunteers were supported through monthly mentoring teleconferences, on‐line tips and discussion board conversations. A web portal was developed to be used by the team, volunteers and community participants. Workshop curriculum was developed based on diabetes footcare and self‐management best practise guidelines. Community participants answered pre‐and post‐workshop statements that indicated that learning occurred, as indicated by an increase in the number of statements answered correctly. Participants' feedback about the workshops was positive. In telephone follow‐up interviews, 97% of respondents reported having changed their foot self‐management behaviours. The portal was commonly used according to website visits, but not as much as expected for registration of community participants. It is recommended that this programme be made widely available and tailored to the specific needs of the communities and that further evaluation be conducted.
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Anderson RM;Funnell MM
通讯作者：
Funnell MM