Alternatives to gadolinium-based metal chelates for magnetic resonance imaging.
Alternatives to gadolinium-based metal chelates for magnetic resonance imaging.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/cr900284a
复制
发表时间:
2010-05-12
期刊:
影响因子:
62.1
通讯作者:
Sherry, A. Dean
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Viswanathan, Subha;Kovacs, Zoltan;Green, Kayla N.;Ratnakar, S. James;Sherry, A. Dean
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been immensely valuable in diagnostic clinical imaging over the last few decades owing to its exceptional spatial and anatomical resolution. The signal in MRI is generated by relaxation of the transverse component of the net magnetization of protons present in the body, predominantly from bulk water. Thus, any agent or process that affects the net magnetization of the water protons in body tissues will also influence image contrast. Gd3+-based contrast agents shorten both the longitudinal and transverse relaxation times (T1 and T2) of water protons to approximately the same extent, in essence by relaxing all nearby proton spins. This effect is detected as increased signal intensity in T1-weighted MRI images when the appropriate pulse sequence is applied. Over the past 25 years Gd3+-complexes have been spectacularly successful as extracellular or blood pool T1 agents but their relative insensitivity to changes in environment coupled with the fact that they are never completely silent limits their applicability in the design of responsive MRI agents. A conceptually different approach to contrast enhancement is based on chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST). This technique relies on dynamic chemical exchange processes inherent in biological tissues to transfer saturated 1H spins into the bulk water proton pool, which leads to a decrease of net magnetization and is detected as a negative contrast (darkening of the image) in MRI. Originally exchangeable-NH and-OH protons of various biomolecules were used to generate CEST contrast (DIACEST). However, these agents suffer from a few drawbacks, particularly in association with the small, usually less than 6 ppm, chemical shift difference between the two exchanging pools. The great benefit of using paramagnetic hyperfine shifting lanthanide complexes as CEST agents (PARACEST) is that the chemical shift difference between the two exchanging pools can potentially be much larger, up to several hundred ppm, facilitating easy saturation of one of the exchangeable spin pools without partial saturation of the bulk water pool. Another advantage of PARACEST is that the
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Aime, S;Barge, A;Puschmann, H
通讯作者:
Puschmann, H
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
AIME, S;BOTTA, M;VIRTUANI, M
通讯作者:
VIRTUANI, M
影响因子:
15
作者:
Aime, S;Barge, A;DeSousa, AS
通讯作者:
DeSousa, AS
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
AIME, S;NANO, R;GRANDI, M
通讯作者:
GRANDI, M
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Aime, S;Botta, M;Merbach, AE
通讯作者:
Merbach, AE