Recommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveys.

Recommended core items to assess e-cigarette use in population-based surveys.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053541
复制
发表时间:
2018-05
期刊:
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Cohen JE
Cohen JE
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pearson JL;Hitchman SC;Brose LS;Bauld L;Glasser AM;Villanti AC;McNeill A;Abrams DB;Cohen JE

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

使用标准化项目来评估青年和成年人群中电子烟使用的一致方法将有助于对电子烟(和烟草)政策的影响进行交叉调查和跨国比较,并提高我们对电子烟使用对人群健康影响的理解。针对成年人的行为,我们提出了一套电子烟使用项目,讨论了它们的效用和潜在的适应性,并强调了研究人员在没有进一步开发项目的情况下应该避免的电子烟结构。可靠和有效的项目将加强新兴科学,并为决策提供知识综合。在来自15个国家的65名专家参加的一系列国际会议的非正式讨论的基础上,作者提出了评估电子烟使用行为、相对感知伤害、设备类型、尼古丁的存在、口味和使用原因的建议。我们建议评估八个核心结构的项目:电子烟曾经使用过,使用频率和以前的日常使用;相对感知伤害;设备类型;主要口味偏好;尼古丁的存在;以及使用的主要原因。这些项目应标准化,或根据政策背景和目标人群进行最低限度的调整。研究人员应该准备好随着电子烟设备特性的变化而更新项目。提出了一套最低限度的电子烟项目,以鼓励围绕项目达成共识,以便对电子烟使用行为进行跨调查和跨司法管辖区的比较。这些拟议项目是一个起点。我们认识到持续改进的空间,并欢迎电子烟用户和科学同事的意见。
A consistent approach using standardized items to assess e-cigarette use in both youth and adult populations will aid cross-survey and cross-national comparisons of the effect of e-cigarette (and tobacco) policies and improve our understanding of the population health impact of e-cigarette use. Focusing on adult behavior, we propose a set of e-cigarette use items, discuss their utility and potential adaptation, and highlight e-cigarette constructs that researchers should avoid without further item development. Reliable and valid items will strengthen the emerging science and inform knowledge synthesis for policymaking. Building on informal discussions at a series of international meetings of 65 experts from 15 countries, the authors provide recommendations for assessing e-cigarette use behavior, relative perceived harm, device type, presence of nicotine, flavors, and reasons for use. We recommend items assessing eight core constructs: e-cigarette ever use, frequency of use, and former daily use; relative perceived harm; device type; primary flavor preference; presence of nicotine; and primary reason for use. These items should be standardized or minimally adapted for the policy context and target population. Researchers should be prepared to update items as e-cigarette device characteristics change. A minimum set of e-cigarette items is proposed to encourage consensus around items to allow for cross-survey and cross-jurisdictional comparisons of e-cigarette use behavior. These proposed items are a starting point. We recognize room for continued improvement, and welcome input from e-cigarette users and scientific colleagues.
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.009
发表时间: 2015-09-01
期刊: PUBLIC HEALTH
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
Eastwood, B.;Dockrell, M. J.;McNeill, A.
通讯作者: McNeill, A.
DOI: 10.17269/cjph.105.4119
发表时间: 2014-03-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Czoli, Christine D.;Hammond, David;White, Christine M.
通讯作者: White, Christine M.
DOI: 10.1111/add.12623
发表时间: 2014-09-01
期刊: ADDICTION
影响因子: 6
作者:
Brown, Jamie;Beard, Emma;West, Robert
通讯作者: West, Robert
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu200
发表时间: 2015-02-01
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Biener, Lois;Hargraves, J. Lee
通讯作者: Hargraves, J. Lee
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-479
发表时间: 2011-06-18
期刊: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Fidler, Jennifer A.;Shahab, Lion;West, Robert
通讯作者: West, Robert