The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
复制
发表时间：
2010-11
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Hays, Ron
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cella, David;Riley, William;Stone, Arthur;Rothrock, Nan;Reeve, Bryce;Yount, Susan;Amtmann, Dagmar;Bode, Rita;Buysse, Daniel;Choi, Seung;Cook, Karon;DeVellis, Robert;DeWalt, Darren;Fries, James F.;Gershon, Richard;Hahn, Elizabeth A.;Lai, Jin-Shei;Pilkonis, Paul;Revicki, Dennis;Rose, Matthias;Weinfurt, Kevin;Hays, Ron
关键词：
患者报告的结果(PRO)在评估医疗保健中的许多新治疗方法时是必不可少的，但目前的衡量标准受到研究和疾病评分缺乏精确度、标准化和可比性的限制。患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROIS™)提供了题库，提供了对通常研究的PRO进行高效(最大限度地减少项目数而不影响可靠性)、灵活(允许选择使用可互换的项目)和精确(估计误差最小)的PRO测量的可能性。我们报告第一次大规模PROMIS项目测试的结果。在美国普通人群和临床群体中，使用在线小组和诊所招募对14个项目库进行了测试。创建了一个反映与2000年美国人口普查成比例的人口统计数据的尺度设置子样本。使用项目反应理论(分级反应模型)，在21,133个样本上校准了11个题库，测量了自我报告的身心健康和社会健康的组成部分，以及10个项目的全球健康量表。编制了每家银行的简短表格，并将其与整个银行以及其他经过充分验证和广泛接受的(“遗留”)措施进行了比较。所有题库在大多数分数分布上都表现出良好的可靠性。结构效度得到了与遗留测量的中等到高度的相关性的支持。PROMIS题库及其缩写形式提供了证据，证明它们是可与传统仪器相媲美的通用症状和功能报告的可靠和准确的测量方法。进一步的测试将继续在不同的临床人群中验证和测试PROMIS项目和库。
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential when evaluating many new treatments in health care, yet current measures have been limited by a lack of precision, standardization and comparability of scores across studies and diseases. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) provides item banks that offer the potential for PRO measurement that is efficient (minimizes item number without compromising reliability) flexible (enables optional use of interchangeable items), and precise (has minimal error in estimate) measurement of commonly-studied PROs. We report results from the first large-scale testing of PROMIS items. Fourteen item pools were tested in the U.S. general population and clinical groups using an online panel and clinic recruitment. A scale-setting sub-sample was created reflecting demographics proportional to the 2000 U.S. census. Using item response theory (graded response model), 11 item banks were calibrated on a sample of 21,133, measuring components of self-reported physical, mental and social health, along with a 10-item global health scale. Short forms from each bank were developed and compared to the overall bank as well as with other well-validated and widely accepted (“legacy”) measures. All item banks demonstrated good reliability across the majority of the score distributions. Construct validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations with legacy measures. PROMIS item banks and their short forms provide evidence they are reliable and precise measures of generic symptoms and functional reports comparable to legacy instruments. Further testing will continue to validate and test PROMIS items and banks in diverse clinical populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Castel, Liana D.;Williams, Kelly A.;DeVellis, Robert F.
通讯作者：
DeVellis, Robert F.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Chang, HM
通讯作者：
Chang, HM
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Christodoulou, Christopher;Junghaenel, Doerte U.;Stone, Arthur A.
通讯作者：
Stone, Arthur A.
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Cella, David;Gershon, Richard;Choi, Seung
通讯作者：
Choi, Seung
影响因子：
3
作者：
Hays, Ron D.;Liu, Honghu;Cella, David
通讯作者：
Cella, David