Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective.
Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/risa.13165
复制
发表时间：
2019-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lebret E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clahsen SCS;van Kamp I;Hakkert BC;Vermeire TG;Piersma AH;Lebret E
为什么各国对射频电磁场和内分泌干扰物等环境健康风险的监管或倾向于采取不同的监管方式？可以使用各种理论、模型和框架来帮助回答这个问题，尽管最终的答案在很大程度上取决于所应用的理论观点。在这篇理论综述中，我们将探讨来自不同科学领域的八个概念框架，这些框架将提供八种不同的潜在解释，解释为什么在环境健康风险管理中会出现国际差异。我们特别感兴趣的是能够阐明科学专门知识在风险管理过程中的作用的框架。包括在这次审查的框架是风险评估范式，研究专家作为政策顾问的作用，心理测量范式，风险的文化理论，参与性的风险评估和风险管理的方法，宣传联盟框架，风险的社会放大框架，和霍夫施泰德的国家文化模式。我们从我们的知识和经验，关于一套不同的学科，务实地组装一套多学科的框架。从八个框架提供的想法和概念，我们得到相关的问题，用于进一步的实证工作，我们提出了一个总体框架来描绘框架之间可以绘制的各种联系。
Why do countries regulate, or prefer to regulate, environmental health risks such as radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and endocrine disruptors differently? A wide variety of theories, models, and frameworks can be used to help answer this question, though the resulting answer will strongly depend on the theoretical perspective that is applied. In this theoretical review, we will explore eight conceptual frameworks, from different areas of science, which will offer eight different potential explanations as to why international differences occur in environmental health risk management. We are particularly interested in frameworks that could shed light on the role of scientific expertise within risk management processes. The frameworks included in this review are the Risk Assessment Paradigm, research into the roles of experts as policy advisors, the Psychometric Paradigm, the Cultural Theory of Risk, participatory approaches to risk assessment and risk management, the Advocacy Coalition Framework, the Social Amplification of Risk Framework, and Hofstede's Model of National Cultures. We drew from our knowledge and experiences regarding a diverse set of academic disciplines to pragmatically assemble a multidisciplinary set of frameworks. From the ideas and concepts offered by the eight frameworks, we derive pertinent questions to be used in further empirical work and we present an overarching framework to depict the various links that could be drawn between the frameworks.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Beronius, Anna;Ruden, Christina;Hanberg, Annika
通讯作者：
Hanberg, Annika
影响因子：
11.4
作者：
Dolan, Tom;Howsam, Peter;Whelan, Mick J.
通讯作者：
Whelan, Mick J.
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
DAKE, K
通讯作者：
DAKE, K
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-642-13926-0
发表时间：
2010-01-01
期刊：
RISK MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE: CONCEPTS, GUIDELINES AND APPLICATIONS
影响因子：
--
作者：
Aven, Terje;Renn, Ortwin
通讯作者：
Renn, Ortwin
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
Bakir, V
通讯作者：
Bakir, V