Pinioning the Peacekeepers: Sovereignty, Host-State Resistance against Peacekeeping Missions, and Violence against Civilians
Pinioning the Peacekeepers: Sovereignty, Host-State Resistance against Peacekeeping Missions, and Violence against Civilians
复制标题
维和人员的动力：主权、东道国对维和任务的抵抗以及针对平民的暴力
DOI：
10.1093/isr/viaa063
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Allard Duursma
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allard Duursma
东道国为何以及如何抵制当代维和行动？本文提出了东道国对维和人员的抵抗是一种平衡内战国家主权内外挑战的策略。政府官员可能会将激烈的反叛乱运动视为重新获得对暴力的垄断，从而加强国家内部主权的有效途径，但这往往会招致国际社会的批评，从而也会导致国家外部主权的侵蚀。相反，接受维和任务可以加强内战国家的外部主权，因为这种接受表明愿意管理武装暴力，但维和人员的部署是以牺牲内部主权为代价的，因为它经常限制政府军队进行镇压叛乱的能力。各国可以通过接受维持和平特派团来支持其对外主权来解决这一困境，但与此同时，在维持和平活动可能干扰政府军重新获得使用暴力的垄断权的地区，努力限制维持和平人员的效力。这篇文章聚焦于苏丹政府如何接受联合国-非洲联盟驻达尔富尔维和部队（UNAMID）的部署，但同时又破坏了其保护平民的努力，尽管其他案例也被考虑在内。
Why and how do host-states resist contemporary peacekeeping missions? This article puts forward the argument that host-state resistance against peacekeepers is a strategy to balance challenges to the internal and external faces of a civil war state's sovereignty. Government officials might see an intense counter-insurgency campaign as an effective way to regain the monopoly on violence and thus strengthen the internal sovereignty of the state, but this will often lead to criticism from the international community and thus also lead to an erosion of the external sovereignty of the state. Conversely, the acceptance of a peacekeeping mission can strengthen a civil war state's external sovereignty as this acceptance signals a willingness to manage armed violence, but the deployment of peacekeepers is at the expense of internal sovereignty as it often limits the ability of government troops to conduct their counter-insurgency efforts. States can resolve this dilemma by accepting a peacekeeping mission to prop up their external sovereignty, but at the same time trying to limit the effectiveness of peacekeepers in those areas where peacekeeping activities potentially interfere with the efforts of government troops to regain the monopoly on the use of violence. The article zooms in on how the Sudanese government accepted the deployment of the United Nations–African Union Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (UNAMID), but at the same undermined its civilian protection efforts, though other cases are considered as well.
国际刑事法院对巴希尔的起诉及其对达尔富尔维和与人道主义行动的影响
影响因子：
2
作者：
Duursma A
通讯作者：
Duursma A
在维护和平的同时计算死亡人数：对联合军事委员会在达尔富尔的现场信息和分析能力的评估
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Duursma A
通讯作者：
Duursma A
维和行动中的信息处理挑战：马里维和信息收集工作案例研究
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Duursma A
通讯作者：
Duursma A