Characterizing engineering outreach educators' talk moves: An exploratory framework

Characterizing engineering outreach educators' talk moves: An exploratory framework
复制标题

表征工程外展教育工作者的谈话动作:探索性框架

DOI:
10.1002/jee.20514
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Maltese, Adam V.
Maltese, Adam V.
中科院分区:
工程技术2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miel, Karen;Swanson, Rebecca D.;Portsmore, Merredith;Paul, Kelli M.;Moison, Elizabeth A.;Kim, Jungsun;Maltese, Adam V.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

背景尽管K-12工程外展计划的流行和潜力,外展教育工作者促进工程学习经验的时刻到时刻的动态研究不足。有必要确定外展教育工作者的教学动作,并探讨这些move.Purpose/HypothesisWe的影响提供了一个初步的框架,工程外展教育工作者的教学动作的雄心勃勃的指令的原则。本研究描述了外展教育工作者的教学动作,并确定学习机会提供这些move.Design/MethodThrough话语分析的视频录像的大学主导的工程外展计划,我们确定了教学动作的新手工程外展教育工作者与小学生设计团队的互动。我们认为18外展教育工作者的教学动作通过一个透镜雄心勃勃的instruction.ResultsIn小组的互动,外展教育工作者使用雄心勃勃的,保守的,包容性的教学动作。这些新手教育者利用谈话动作集中学生的想法和机构。雄心勃勃的举措包括两个新颖的教学举措:设计签到和撤销学生想法的有形表现。雄心勃勃的举措为学生提供了从事工程设计的机会。保守的举措为学生提供了取得技术和情感进步并体验工程规范的机会。结论我们的工作在描述工程外展教育工作者的教学举措方面具有开创性意义,并指出了外展教育工作者使用雄心勃勃的举措的能力。雄心勃勃的工程教学可能是一个有用的框架,设计工程推广,以支持学生的参与和工程设计的进展。此外,保守的教学举措,通常被认为是限制,可能会支持富有成效的学生的影响和参与工程设计。
BackgroundDespite the prevalence and potential of K–12 engineering outreach programs, the moment‐to‐moment dynamics of outreach educators' facilitation of engineering learning experiences are understudied. There is a need to identify outreach educators' teaching moves and to explore the implications of these moves.Purpose/HypothesisWe offer a preliminary framework for characterizing engineering outreach educators' teaching moves in relation to principles of ambitious instruction. This study describes outreach educators' teaching moves and identifies learning opportunities afforded by these moves.Design/MethodThrough discourse analysis of video recordings of a university‐led engineering outreach program, we identified teaching moves of novice engineering outreach educators in interaction with elementary student design teams. We considered 18 outreach educators' teaching moves through a lens of ambitious instruction.ResultsIn small group interactions, outreach educators used ambitious, conservative, and inclusive teaching moves. These novice educators utilized talk moves that centered students' ideas and agency. Ambitious moves included two novel teaching moves: design check‐ins and revoicing tangible manifestations of students' ideas. Ambitious moves offered students opportunities to engage in engineering design. Conservative moves provided opportunities for students to make technical and affective progress, and to experience engineering norms.ConclusionsOur work is formative in describing engineering outreach educators' teaching moves and points to outreach educators' capability in using ambitious moves. Ambitious engineering instruction may be a useful framework for designing engineering outreach to support students' participation and progress in engineering design. Additionally, conservative teaching moves, typically considered constraining, may support productive student affect and engagement in engineering design.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Kris D. Gutiérrez;Shirin Vossoughi
通讯作者: Shirin Vossoughi
在活动中学习
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Greeno;Yrjö Engeström
通讯作者: Yrjö Engeström
“现在几点了,丹尼斯?”:在课堂讨论中询问已知信息问题
DOI: --
发表时间: 1979
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
H. Mehan
通讯作者: H. Mehan
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Arvindh N Kanagasundram;T. Richardson;W. Stevenson
通讯作者: W. Stevenson
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20365
发表时间: 2010-05-01
期刊: SCIENCE EDUCATION
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Alozie, Nonye M.;Moje, Elizabeth Birr;Krajcik, Joseph S.
通讯作者: Krajcik, Joseph S.