Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/s13421-012-0288-z
复制
发表时间:
2013-07
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Gordon PC
Gordon PC
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lowder MW;Choi W;Gordon PC

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

利用长期重复启动的记忆研究普遍表明,启动是更大的低频字比高频字,这种效果持续存在,如果话之间的总理和目标的干预。相比之下,利用掩蔽的短期重复启动的单词识别研究通常表明,重复启动的大小并不作为词频的函数而不同,并且不会在中间的单词中持续存在。我们进行了眼动追踪,而阅读实验,以确定这些模式更接近的频率和重复之间的关系,在自然的阅读的文本。使用高频的专有名称(例如,Stephen)或低频(例如,Dominic)。这个关键的名字后来在句子中重复出现,或者引入了一个新的名字。关键名称的首过阅读次数和跳过率显示了强大的重复频率的相互作用,这样的重复启动效应的幅度是更大的低频名称比高频名称。与此相反,后期处理的措施表明,不依赖于词频的重复效果。这些结果被解释的框架内,概念化的眼动控制,以不同的方式受到词汇和话语层面的因素。
Memory studies utilizing long-term repetition priming have generally demonstrated that priming is greater for low-frequency words than for high-frequency words and that this effect persists if words intervene between the prime and the target. In contrast, word-recognition studies utilizing masked short-term repetition priming typically show that the magnitude of repetition priming does not differ as a function of word frequency and does not persist across intervening words. We conducted an eye-tracking while reading experiment to determine which of these patterns more closely resembles the relationship between frequency and repetition during the natural reading of a text. Frequency was manipulated using proper names that were high-frequency (e.g., Stephen) or low-frequency (e.g., Dominic). The critical name was later repeated in the sentence, or a new name was introduced. First-pass reading times and skipping rates on the critical name revealed robust repetition-by-frequency interactions such that the magnitude of the repetition-priming effect was greater for low-frequency names than for high-frequency names. In contrast, measures of later processing showed effects of repetition that did not depend on lexical frequency. These results are interpreted within a framework that conceptualizes eye-movement control as being influenced in different ways by lexical- and discourse-level factors.
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2204_1
发表时间: 1998-10-01
期刊: COGNITIVE SCIENCE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Gordon, PC;Hendrick, R
通讯作者: Hendrick, R
DOI: 10.1080/17470211003687546
发表时间: 2010-12
期刊: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
影响因子: --
作者:
Coane JH;Balota DA
通讯作者: Balota DA
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340
发表时间: 1984-01-01
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
BALOTA, DA;CHUMBLEY, JI
通讯作者: CHUMBLEY, JI
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.582
发表时间: 1999-07-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Bowers, JS
通讯作者: Bowers, JS
DOI: 10.1037/a0030432
发表时间: 2013-08-01
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Choi, Wonil;Gordon, Peter C.
通讯作者: Gordon, Peter C.