Psychometrics, Reliability, and Validity of a Wraparound Team Observation Measure.
Psychometrics, Reliability, and Validity of a Wraparound Team Observation Measure.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10826-014-9908-5
复制
发表时间：
2015-04-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Sather A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bruns EJ;Weathers ES;Suter JC;Hensley S;Pullmann MD;Sather A
Wraparound is a widely-implemented team-based care coordination process for youth with serious emotional and behavioral needs. Wraparound has a positive evidence base; however, research has shown inconsistency in the quality of its implementation that can reduce its effectiveness. The current paper presents results of three studies used to examine psychometrics, reliability, and validity of a measure of wraparound fidelity as assessed during team meetings called the Team Observation Measure (TOM). Analysis of TOM results from 1,078 team observations across 59 sites found good overall internal consistency (alpha = .80), but constrained variability, with the average team rated as having 78% of indicators of model adherent wraparound present, 11% absent, and 11% not applicable. A study of N=23 pairs of raters found a pooled Kappa statistic of .733, indicating substantial inter-rater reliability. Higher agreement was found between external evaluators than for pairs of raters that included an external evaluator and an internal rater (e.g., supervisor or coach). A validity study found no correlation between the TOM and an alternate fidelity instrument, the Wraparound Fidelity Index (WFI), at the team level. However, positive correlations between mean program-level TOM and WFI scores provide support for TOM validity as a summative assessment of site- or program-level fidelity. Implications for TOM users, measure refinement, and future research are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/15374416.2013.859081
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bruns EJ;Walker JS;Bernstein A;Daleiden E;Pullmann MD;Chorpita BF
通讯作者：
Chorpita BF
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Bruns, Eric J.;Sather, April;Stambaugh, Leyla Faw
通讯作者：
Stambaugh, Leyla Faw
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Chambless, DL;Hollon, SD
通讯作者：
Hollon, SD
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Eames, C.;Daley, D.;Bywater, T.
通讯作者：
Bywater, T.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Bruns, Eric J.;Walker, Janet S.;Pires, Sheila A.
通讯作者：
Pires, Sheila A.