Intercomparison of model response and internal variability across climate model ensembles
Intercomparison of model response and internal variability across climate model ensembles
复制标题
气候模型集合的模型响应和内部变异性的相互比较
DOI:
10.1007/s00382-017-3914-4
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
A. Ganguly
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Devashish Kumar;A. Ganguly
Characterization of climate uncertainty at regional scales over near-term planning horizons (0–30 years) is crucial for climate adaptation. Climate internal variability (CIV) dominates climate uncertainty over decadal prediction horizons at stakeholders’ scales (regional to local). In the literature, CIV has been characterized indirectly using projections of climate change from multi-model ensembles (MME) instead of directly using projections from multiple initial condition ensembles (MICE), primarily because adequate number of initial condition (IC) runs were not available for any climate model. Nevertheless, the recent availability of significant number of IC runs from one climate model allows for the first time to characterize CIV directly from climate model projections and perform a sensitivity analysis to study the dominance of CIV compared to model response variability (MRV). Here, we measure relative agreement (a dimensionless number with values ranging between 0 and 1, inclusive; a high value indicates less variability and vice versa) among MME and MICE and find that CIV is lower than MRV for all projection time horizons and spatial resolutions for precipitation and temperature. However, CIV exhibits greater dominance over MRV for seasonal and annual mean precipitation at higher latitudes where signals of climate change are expected to emerge sooner. Furthermore, precipitation exhibits large uncertainties and a rapid decline in relative agreement from global to continental, regional, or local scales for MICE compared to MME. The fractional contribution of uncertainty due to CIV is invariant for precipitation and decreases for temperature as lead time progresses towards the end of the century.
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Doug M. Smith;Adam A. Scaife;G. Boer;M. Caian;F. Doblas-Reyes;V. Guemas;E. Hawkins;W. Hazeleger;L. Hermanson;Chun Kit Ho;M. Ishii;V. Kharin;M. Kimoto;B. Kirtman;J. Lean;D. Matei;W. Merryfield;W. Müller;H. Pohlmann;A. Rosati;B. Wouters;K. Wyser
通讯作者:
Doug M. Smith;Adam A. Scaife;G. Boer;M. Caian;F. Doblas-Reyes;V. Guemas;E. Hawkins;W. Hazeleger;L. Hermanson;Chun Kit Ho;M. Ishii;V. Kharin;M. Kimoto;B. Kirtman;J. Lean;D. Matei;W. Merryfield;W. Müller;H. Pohlmann;A. Rosati;B. Wouters;K. Wyser