Being careful what we wish for? Challenges and opportunities afforded through engagement with business and management research
Being careful what we wish for? Challenges and opportunities afforded through engagement with business and management research
复制标题
小心我们的愿望吗？
DOI：
10.1080/01446193.2016.1270462
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Mike Bresnen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mike Bresnen
摘要尽管建筑管理中的工作，借鉴管理和组织理论的扩散，两个遗漏站出来的身体出版的工作：没有任何真实的辩论的价值观的严谨性和相关性的研究;和未充分利用占主导地位的观点，在业务和管理研究（如制度理论）框架建设管理和组织问题。特别是借鉴制度逻辑和制度工作的想法，本文探讨了紧张局势，讽刺和矛盾的严格相关性辩论，面临的挑战和机遇，建设管理研究（CMR）及其机构在进一步管理和组织研究议程。在这样做时，注意力集中在商业和管理领域知识库的复杂性、争议性和不断变化的性质，以及实践社区与《公路货运公约》之间的主要区别。
Abstract Despite the proliferation of work within construction management that draws upon management and organizational theory, two omissions stand out from the body of published work: the absence of any real debate about the values of rigour and relevance in research; and the under-use of dominant perspectives in business and management research (such as institutional theory) to frame construction management and organizational issues. Drawing specifically upon the ideas of institutional logics and institutional work, this paper explores the tensions, ironies and contradictions of the rigour-relevance debate; and the challenges and opportunities facing construction management research (CMR) and its institutions in furthering management and organizational research agendas. In doing so, attention is directed to the complex, contested and changing nature of the knowledge base within the business and management field; as well as key differences between that community of practice and CMR.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Beech, Nic;MacIntosh, Robert;MacLean, Donald
通讯作者：
MacLean, Donald
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00750.x
发表时间：
2011-09
期刊：
Wiley-Blackwell: British Journal of Management
影响因子：
--
作者：
Andrew Sturdy
通讯作者：
Andrew Sturdy