Moving towards sustainable food systems: A review of Indian food policy budgets.

Moving towards sustainable food systems: A review of Indian food policy budgets.
复制标题

迈向可持续粮食系统:印度粮食政策预算审查。

DOI:
10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100462
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
Global food security
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Knai C
Knai C
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brown KA;Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy N;Law C;Harris F;Kadiyala S;Shankar B;Mohan S;Prabhakaran D;Knai C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

向可持续粮食系统迈进是一个复杂的问题,需要国家粮食政策的高度协调、一致性和一体化。本研究的目的是探讨环境可持续性如何融入印度的国家粮食政策。对粮食政策进行了范围审查,并将审查结果与部长职责、预算分配估计数和相关可持续发展目标相关联。确定了52项政策,由10个部委负责,与6项可持续发展目标相关。内容分析发现,提及环境可持续性的政策集中在预算拨款最少的政策中。将环境可持续性纳入粮食政策,并避免与更完善的卫生、社会和经济优先事项发生冲突,需要资源和政治意愿。环境可持续性并没有始终贯穿印度的食品政策。像大多数国家一样,印度的食品政策是分散和分散的。粮食生产政策最有可能涉及环境可持续性。环境可持续性在食品消费政策中很少被提及。优先考虑环境可持续性的政策得到的资金最少。
Moving towards sustainable food systems is a complex problem, which requires high level co-ordination, coherence, and integration of national food policy. The aim of this study is to explore where environmental sustainability is integrated into national food policy in India. A scoping review of food policies was conducted, and findings mapped to ministerial responsibility, estimated budget allocation, and relevant Sustainable Development Goals. Fifty-two policies were identified, under the responsibility of 10 ministries, and with relevance to six Sustainable Development Goals. Content analysis identified references to environmental sustainability were concentrated in policies with the smallest budgetary allocation. Resources together with political will are required to integrate environmental sustainability into food policies and avoid conflicts with more well-established health, societal, and economic priorities. Environmental sustainability is not consistently integrated across Indian food policy. Food policy in India, like most countries, is disparate and fragmented. Food production policies are the most likely to refer to environmental sustainability. Environmental sustainability is infrequently referenced in food consumption policies. The policies that prioritised environmental sustainability were the ones that received the least funding.
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2082
发表时间: 2020-06-08
影响因子: 12.5
作者:
Forestier, Oana;Kim, Rakhyun E.
通讯作者: Kim, Rakhyun E.
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
发表时间: 2017-12-01
期刊: POLICY SCIENCES
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Cejudo, Guillermo M.;Michel, Cynthia L.
通讯作者: Michel, Cynthia L.
DOI: 10.1017/s0029665112002947
发表时间: 2013-02-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Garnett, Tara
通讯作者: Garnett, Tara
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61692-x
发表时间: 2008-11-08
期刊: LANCET
影响因子: 168.9
作者:
Friel, Sharon;Marmot, Michael;Vagero, Denny
通讯作者: Vagero, Denny