Equal appearing interval and visual analogue scaling of perceptual roughness and breathiness
Equal appearing interval and visual analogue scaling of perceptual roughness and breathiness
复制标题
感知粗糙度和呼吸度的等出现间隔和视觉模拟标度
DOI：
10.1080/0269920042000193599
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
C. Ng
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Yiu;C. Ng
影响知觉语音评价信度的因素之一是评分表。等出现间隔(EAI)和视觉模拟(VA)标尺是两种最常用的标尺，在最近的知觉语音评价研究中引起了极大的关注。现有的研究结果是相互矛盾的，一项研究发现EAI量表更可取，而更早的一项研究显示结果模棱两可。本研究的目的是比较11分EAI量表和10 厘米长的VA量表用于感知语音质量评估的可靠性。30名没有知觉嗓音评估经验的听者被要求对28个声音样本的喘息和粗糙音质进行评分。结果表明，与VA量表相比，听者在使用EAI量表对两种知觉语音质量进行评分时，表现出显著更高的评价者内部一致性和更低的评价者之间的变异性。然而，听者倾向于使用EAI量表上的某些分数，而不是VA量表上的某些分数。此外，EAI和VA评分之间存在线性关系，这表明EAI和VA量表同样可以很好地捕捉呼吸和粗暴品质的心理概念特征。由于评价表的易用性是临床情况下的一个重要考虑因素，因此，11分、10 cm长的EAI量表比VA量表更可取，尽管不一定更好，以评估呼吸和粗糙的质量。
One of the factors that affects the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation is the rating scale. Equal‐appearing interval (EAI) and visual analogue (VA) scales are the two most common scales used and have attracted much attention in recent studies of perceptual voice evaluation. Available findings are contradictory, with one study finding the EAI scale to be more desirable while an earlier study showed equivocal results. The objective of the present study was to compare the reliability of using an 11‐point EAI scale and a VA scale, each of 10 cm long, for perceptual voice quality evaluation. Thirty listeners with no prior experience in perceptual voice evaluation were asked to rate the breathy and rough qualities of 28 voice samples. The results showed that the listeners demonstrated a significantly higher intra‐rater agreement and lower inter‐rater variability in rating the two perceptual voice qualities using the EAI scale, when compared to the VA scale. However, listeners tend to show more bias in using certain points on the EAI scale than on the VA scale. In addition, a linear relationship was found between the EAI and VA ratings, suggesting the psychoperceptual characteristics of breathy and rough qualities could be captured equally well by the EAI and VA scales. Since the ease of use of the rating scale is an important consideration in clinical situations, the 11‐point, 10 cm long EAI scale is therefore more preferable, although not necessarily more superior, than the VA scale for evaluating breathy and rough qualities.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1121/1.424372
发表时间：
1998-10
期刊：
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Kreiman;B. Gerratt
通讯作者：
J. Kreiman;B. Gerratt
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3601.21
发表时间：
1993-02-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子：
--
作者：
KREIMAN, J;GERRATT, BR;BERKE, GS
通讯作者：
BERKE, GS
听众在语音质量评估方面存在分歧的来源。
DOI：
10.1121/1.1289362
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kreiman,J;Gerratt,BR
通讯作者：
Gerratt,BR
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3601.14
发表时间：
1993-02-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH
影响因子：
--
作者：
GERRATT, BR;KREIMAN, J;BERKE, GS
通讯作者：
BERKE, GS
听众对语音质量的体验和感知。
DOI：
10.1044/jshr.3301.103
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
Journal of speech and hearing research
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kreiman,J;Gerratt,BR;Precoda,K
通讯作者：
Precoda,K