The sit up test to exhaustion as a test for muscular endurance evaluation.
The sit up test to exhaustion as a test for muscular endurance evaluation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s40064-015-1023-6
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Palma A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bianco A;Lupo C;Alesi M;Spina S;Raccuglia M;Thomas E;Paoli A;Palma A
本研究的目的是检查仰卧起坐测试到筋疲力尽作为一个现场测试的肌肉耐力评估的样本久坐的人，男女。进行了横断面研究。381名志愿者参加了这项研究（28.5 ± 10.0岁; 168.2 ± 8.9 cm; 65.1 ± 11.1 kg），其中194名男性（27.5 ± 10.2岁; 173.6 ± 7.0 cm; 71.2 ± 5.2 kg）和187例女性（29.6 ± 10.1岁; 162.6 ± 7.1 cm; 58.7 ± 8.9 kg）。每名受试者自愿和随机进行：仰卧起坐试验（SUT）、俯卧撑试验（PUT）和自由重量深蹲试验（ST），所有试验均进行至力竭。数据分析采用多元回归分析。随后，开发了肌肉耐力的百分位数模型。第25、50和75百分位数分别被确定为低肌肉耐力的上限、平均肌肉耐力和高肌肉耐力的下限。将仰卧起坐试验作为因变量，分别对俯卧撑试验和深蹲试验进行多元回归分析，得出系数（R2 = 0.23; r = 0.49; p < 0.001）和（R2 = 0.31; r = 0.57; p < 0.001）。性别分层显示回归系数为（R2 = 0.19; r = 0.44; p < 0.001）对于SUT vs. PUT，以及（R2 = 0.30; r = 0.56; p < 0.001），男性中SUT与ST;以及在女性中，SUT vs. PUT（R2 = 0.23; r = 0.49; p < 0.001），SUT vs. ST（R2 = 0.34; r = 0.59; p < 0.001）。SUT与其他拟议测试的相关性较低，表明采用单一测试进行肌肉耐力的全球评估不是最佳方法。此外，SUT被认为是廉价，安全，适合于男性和女性的核心肌耐力测量。
The aim of this study was to examine the sit up test to exhaustion as a field test for muscular endurance evaluation in a sample of sedentary people of both sexes. A cross-sectional study was performed. Three-hundred-eighty-one participants volunteered for the study (28.5 ± 10.0 years; 168.2 ± 8.9 cm; 65.1 ± 11.1 kg), of which 194 males (27.5 ± 10.2 years; 173.6 ± 7.0 cm; 71.2 ± 5.2 kg) and 187 females (29.6 ± 10.1 years; 162.6 ± 7.1 cm; 58.7 ± 8.9 kg). Each subject voluntarily and randomly performed: a sit up test (SUT), a push up test (PUT), and a free weight squat test (ST), all till exhaustion. A multiple regression analysis was adopted for data analysis. Subsequently a percentile model for muscle endurance was developed. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile were identified as upper limit for low muscular endurance, average muscular endurance, and lower limit for high muscular endurance, respectively. Considering the sit up test as the dependent variable, the coefficients (R2 = 0.23; r = 0.49; p < 0.001), and (R2 = 0.31; r = 0.57; p < 0.001) emerged from a multiple regression analysis applied with respect to the push up test and the squat test, respectively. Gender stratification showed regression coefficients of (R2 = 0.19; r = 0.44; p < 0.001) for SUT vs. PUT, and (R2 = 0.30; r = 0.56; p < 0.001) for SUT vs. ST in male; and (R2 = 0.23; r = 0.49; p < 0.001) for SUT vs. PUT, and (R2 = 0.34; r = 0.59; p < 0.001) for SUT vs. ST in female. The SUT showed low inter-relation with the other proposed tests indicating that the adoption of a single test for the global evaluation of muscle endurance is not the optimal approach. Moreover, the SUT was found to be inexpensive, safe, and appropriate for core muscle endurance measurement for both male and female.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Butler, Robert J.;Plisky, Phillip J.;Kiesel, Kyle B.
通讯作者：
Kiesel, Kyle B.
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Snarr, Ronald L.;Esco, Michael R.
通讯作者：
Esco, Michael R.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Seo SH;Jeon IH;Cho YH;Lee HG;Hwang YT;Jang JH
通讯作者：
Jang JH
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Frey, GC;Chow, B
通讯作者：
Chow, B
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182577067
发表时间：
2012-07-01
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Swinton, Paul A.;Lloyd, Ray;Stewart, Arthur D.
通讯作者：
Stewart, Arthur D.