Undoing Equivalence: Rethinking Carbon Accounting for Just Carbon Removal
Undoing Equivalence: Rethinking Carbon Accounting for Just Carbon Removal
复制标题
取消对等：重新思考碳核算以消除碳
DOI：
10.3389/fclim.2021.664130
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kate Dooley
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wim Carton;J. Lund;Kate Dooley
人们越来越关注碳清除在气候政策中的核心地位，特别是在“净零”目标的幌子下。也许最重要的是，将排放量和清除量等同对待，模糊了减排，造成“减缓威慑”。然而，排放减少量和清除量的合并只是碳清除量核算中几种隐含等同之一。在这里，我们研究了其他三种形式的碳，地理和时间的等效性，并讨论其对气候正义和环境风险与碳去除的影响。我们的结论是，“撤销”这些等同将进一步公正地应对气候危机，并试探性地探索这种撤销在实践中可能会是什么样子。
Concerns are increasingly raised over the centrality of carbon removal in climate policy, particularly in the guise of “net-zero” targets. Most significantly perhaps, treating emissions and removals as equivalent obscures emission reductions, resulting in “mitigation deterrence.” Yet the conflation of emission reductions and removals is only one among several implicit equivalences in carbon removal accounting. Here, we examine three other forms—carbon, geographical, and temporal equivalence—and discuss their implications for climate justice and the environmental risks with carbon removal. We conclude that “undoing” these equivalences would further a just response to the climate crisis and tentatively explore what such undoing might look like in practice.
温室气体清除的有争议的框架及其可行性：社会和政治层面
DOI：
10.1002/wcc.649
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
WIREs Climate Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
Waller L
通讯作者：
Waller L
影响因子：
7.1
作者：
Larkin, Alice;Kuriakose, Jaise;Anderson, Kevin
通讯作者：
Anderson, Kevin