Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment in the European Union: a Delphi expert study.
Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment in the European Union: a Delphi expert study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/arclin/acaa083
复制
发表时间：
2021-07-19
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nielsen TR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Franzen S;Papma JM;van den Berg E;Nielsen TR
欧洲联盟（欧盟）的种族多样性日益增加，要求适应神经心理学评估的做法。本研究的目的是探讨欧盟15国跨文化神经心理学评估的现状，并为研究人员和政策制定者提供建议。来自9个欧盟15国的12名专家参加了一项德尔菲共识研究，其中包括连续两轮网上问卷调查和一次面对面的共识会议。专家们根据重要性对德尔菲主题进行单独评分（1-10级）。通过评估第一和第三四分位数（Q1和Q3）和中位数确定共识程度。协商一致的结果表明了以下优先事项：（重要性评分中位数10，Q1-Q3：9-10），（B）收集规范性数据（重要性评分中位数9，Q1-Q3：8-10），以及（c）欧盟神经心理学家在跨文化评估方面的更多培训，意识和知识（重要性评分中位数9，Q1-Q3：8-10）。虽然记忆力测试经常可用，但测量社会认知（中位数9，Q1-Q3：8-10）和语言（中位数9，Q1-Q3：7-10）的测试尤其缺乏。就跨文化神经心理学评估所需的基本技能和知识提出了建议。一个专家小组的这项研究表明，应优先发展和提供跨文化测试和规范性数据，并优先发展和实施培训举措。此外，可以制定欧盟在神经心理评估期间与口译员合作的指导方针。在实施这些建议之前，建议进行后续研究，包括更多的少数民族神经心理学家和社区利益攸关方。
The increasing ethnic diversity in the European Union (EU) calls for adaptations to neuropsychological assessment practices. The aims of this study were to examine the current state of cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment in EU-15 countries and to provide recommendations for researchers and policy makers. Twelve experts from nine EU-15 countries participated in a Delphi consensus study involving two sequential rounds of web-based questionnaires and an in-person consensus meeting. The experts individually rated Delphi topics on the basis of importance (scale 1–10). The degree of consensus was determined by assessing first and third quartiles (Q1 and Q3) and medians. Consensus outcomes showed the following priorities: (a) the development of tests (median importance rating 10, Q1-Q3: 9–10), (b) the collection of normative data (median importance rating 9, Q1-Q3: 8–10), and (c) more training, awareness, and knowledge regarding cross-cultural assessment among neuropsychologists in the EU (median importance rating 9, Q1-Q3: 8–10). Whereas memory tests were often available, tests measuring social cognition (median 9, Q1-Q3: 8–10) and language (median 9, Q1-Q3: 7–10) are particularly lacking. Recommendations were made regarding essential skills and knowledge necessary for cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment. This study in a small group of experts suggests that the development and availability of cross-cultural tests and normative data should be prioritized, as well as the development and implementation of training initiatives. Furthermore, EU guidelines could be established for working with interpreters during neuropsychological assessment. Before implementing these recommendations, follow-up studies are recommended that include more minority neuropsychologists and community stakeholders.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1186/1745-0179-1-13
发表时间：
2005-08-31
期刊：
Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH
影响因子：
--
作者：
Carta, Mauro Giovanni;Bernal, Mariola;Haro-Abad, Josep Maria
通讯作者：
Haro-Abad, Josep Maria
DOI：
10.1017/s135561770505071x
发表时间：
2005-09-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Baiyewu, O;Unverzagt, FW;Hendrie, HC
通讯作者：
Hendrie, HC
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
ARDILA, A;ROSSELLI, M;ROSAS, P
通讯作者：
ROSAS, P
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
FOLSTEIN, MF;FOLSTEIN, SE;MCHUGH, PR
通讯作者：
MCHUGH, PR
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Ardila, A
通讯作者：
Ardila, A