A new 3D stress MRI measurement strategy to quantify surgical correction of prolapse in three support systems.
A new 3D stress MRI measurement strategy to quantify surgical correction of prolapse in three support systems.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/nau.24781
复制
发表时间:
2021-11
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
DeLancey JO
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen L;Swenson CW;Xie B;Ashton-Miller JA;DeLancey JO
The aim of this study was to develop and test the feasibility of an MRI-based measurement strategy to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical procedures in restoring normal anatomy in all three systems of pelvic floor support and quantify the structural changes induced by prolapse surgery. Patients underwent clinical examination and stress MRI preoperatively and again three months postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative measures of three MRI-based structural support systems were made: 1) vaginal wall, 2) apical and paravaginal support, and 3) hiatal closure system. Pre- to postoperative structural changes were calculated and compared to normal values, and bivariate associations were determined. The three structural support systems were successfully quantified for both preoperative and postoperative MRIs regardless of operative approaches in all 15 women in the pilot group. Apical support was restored to normal in 11 of 12 patients who underwent an apical suspension procedure and nine of 14 patients with a posterior repair had normalization of genital hiatus size. Mid-vaginal paravaginal location was elevated an average of 2.5 ± 2.0 cm despite no paravaginal repairs being performed. Paravaginal location improvements were also significantly correlated with apical elevation (r values 0.99–0.87, p<0.001). A strategy that quantifies structural-specific preoperative impairments and improvements after prolapse surgery was successfully developed. Early findings reveal that prolapse surgery is more successful in restoring normal anatomy at Level I than Level III. Improvement in paravaginal location is significantly correlated with apical elevation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Larson, Kindra A.;Luo, Jiajia;Guire, Kenneth E.;Chen, Luyun;Ashton-Miller, James A.;DeLancey, John O. L.
通讯作者:
DeLancey, John O. L.
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Wu JM;Vaughan CP;Goode PS;Redden DT;Burgio KL;Richter HE;Markland AD
通讯作者:
Markland AD
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Vergeldt, Tineke F. M.;van Kuijk, Sander M. J.;Weemhoff, Mirjam
通讯作者:
Weemhoff, Mirjam
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Larson, Kindra A.;Smith, Tovia;Morgan, Daniel M.
通讯作者:
Morgan, Daniel M.
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Fairchild, Pamela S.;Kamdar, Neil S.;Morgan, Daniel M.
通讯作者:
Morgan, Daniel M.