Personality, Group Decision-Making and Leadership
Personality, Group Decision-Making and Leadership
复制标题
个性、群体决策和领导力
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Gurdal
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Seda Ertac;M. Gurdal
本文探讨了人格特质对以下方面的影响：（1）代表群体做出风险决策的意愿，（2）“选择转移”的性质，即在群体背景下和个人之间所承担的风险量的差异。开放性和宜人性成为领导意愿的重要决定因素：与男性领导者和女性领导者相比，非领导者女性和非领导者男性在开放性方面得分较低，在宜人性方面得分较高。神经质解释了女性个体冒险行为的性别差异，女性平均比男性更厌恶风险。一般来说，当受试者代表一个群体做出有风险的决定时，他们会表现得更加谨慎。在男性中，宜人性得分越高，意味着在群体决策中越谨慎，而谨慎则导致谨慎程度降低。相比之下，在女性中，更高的谨慎性分数意味着在群体背景下更高的谨慎性，这表明两种性别可能会以不同的方式解释群体决策中的社会规范。
This paper explores the effect of personality traits on: (1) the willingness to make risk-taking decisions on behalf of a group, (2) the nature of "choice shifts", i.e. the difference between the amount of risk taken in the group context and individually. Openness and agreeableness emerge as significant determinants of the willingness to lead: non-leader women and non-leader men score lower on openness and higher in agreeableness compared to both leader men and leader women. Neuroticism explains the within-gender variance in individual risk-taking among women, who are on average more risk-averse than men. Subjects in general behave more cautiously when they are making risky decisions on behalf of a group. Among men, a higher agreeableness score implies higher caution in group decisions, while conscientiousness leads to less caution. In contrast, among women, a higher conscientiousness score implies higher caution in the group context, suggesting that the two genders might interpret the social norms in group decision-making differently.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Costa, PT;Terracciano, A;McCrae, RR
通讯作者：
McCrae, RR