Commentary: Developing best-practice guidelines for the reporting of E-values.

Commentary: Developing best-practice guidelines for the reporting of E-values.
复制标题

评论:为电子价值报告制定最佳实践指南。

DOI:
10.1093/ije/dyaa094
复制
发表时间:
2020-10-01
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Mathur MB
Mathur MB
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
VanderWeele TJ;Mathur MB

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们要感谢Blum等人1,他们对使用e值评估对未测量混杂因素的敏感性的当前报告实践进行了有趣的分析。与几乎任何定量工具一样,e值可能会被误用,他们的论文中确实记录了5个这样的例子。可以说,这也表明有必要为e值的报告和解释制定最佳实践指南。我们将在这里提供一些关于潜在报告准则的思考。
We would like to thank Blum et al. 1 for their interesting analysis of the current reporting practices around the use of the E-value to evaluate sensitivity to unmeasured confounding. 2, 3 As with nearly any quantitative tool, the E-value is potentially subject to misuse, 4, 5 examples of which are indeed documented in their paper. This arguably also points to the need for the development of best-practice guidelines for the reporting and interpretation of E-values. We will here offer some reflections on potential reporting guidelines.
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000641
发表时间: 2017-05
期刊: Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子: --
作者:
VanderWeele TJ
通讯作者: VanderWeele TJ
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0175
发表时间: 2020-07-01
期刊: JAMA PSYCHIATRY
影响因子: 25.8
作者:
Chen, Ying;Koh, Howard K.;VanderWeele, Tyler J.
通讯作者: VanderWeele, Tyler J.
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000864
发表时间: 2018-09
期刊: Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Mathur MB;Ding P;Riddell CA;VanderWeele TJ
通讯作者: VanderWeele TJ
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12464
发表时间: 2020-08-18
影响因子: 1
作者:
Zaidi, Jaffer M.;VanderWeele, Tyler J.
通讯作者: VanderWeele, Tyler J.
DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000000457
发表时间: 2016-05
期刊: Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Ding P;VanderWeele TJ
通讯作者: VanderWeele TJ