Negotiating the contested terrain of narrative methods in illness contexts.
Negotiating the contested terrain of narrative methods in illness contexts.
复制标题
讨论疾病背景下叙事方法的争议领域。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01239.x
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Carol Thomas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carol Thomas
本文提供了一个正在进行的跨大西洋辩论的疾病叙事煽动出版于1997年的保罗阿特金森的论文叙事转向或盲巷？在这场关于叙事数据和叙事分析的辩论中，我们依次列出了主张和反主张，试图抓住辩论的要点。理论视角、方法论、伦理学和个人政治等问题在四位著名学者的著作中被发现岌岌可危：保罗·阿特金森、亚瑟·博克纳、亚瑟·弗兰克和埃利奥特·米什勒。本文继续考虑在他们的论点中工作的社会学类型，并探讨了作者自己的疾病叙事研究项目的辩论的影响。本文的总体目标是帮助研究人员谁寻求澄清自己的思想在疾病背景下使用叙事研究方法。
This paper offers an interpretive account of an ongoing transatlantic debate about illness narratives instigated by the publication in 1997 of Paul Atkinson's paper Narrative Turn Or Blind Alley? The claims and counter-claims to be found in this debate about narrative data and narrative analysis are set out sequentially, in an attempt to grasp the debate's essentials. Matters of theoretical perspective, methodology, ethics, and personal politics are found to be at stake in the writings of the four featured academics: Paul Atkinson, Arthur Bochner, Arthur Frank and Elliot Mishler. The paper moves on to consider the types of sociologies at work in their arguments, and explores the debate's implications for the author's own illness narratives research project. The paper's overall aim is to assist researchers who seek to clarify their own thinking on the use of narrative research methods in illness contexts.
癌症叙述和方法论的不确定性
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Thomas C
通讯作者：
Thomas C
姑息治疗背景下的叙事研究方法：两个案例研究。
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Thomas C
通讯作者：
Thomas C