Why We Are Still Talking About Leaving
Why We Are Still Talking About Leaving
复制标题
为什么我们仍在谈论离开
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Weston
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Seymour;A. Hunter;T. Weston
在本章中，我们讨论了关于STEM专业学生损失的性质和后果的学术争论。我们还提供了原始研究结果的摘要，《谈论离开：为什么本科生离开科学》（西摩和休伊特，《谈论离开：为什么本科生离开科学》，科罗拉多州博尔德：韦斯特维尤出版社，1997年），本书在本研究的结果中重新讨论了这些结果。最初的工作旨在发现并确定导致从STEM专业转向非STEM专业的高比率因素的相对重要性;目前的研究探讨了在这几年中发生了什么变化和没有发生变化，出现了什么新的变量，以及这些变量如何导致STEM专业的损失。原始调查结果的摘要允许与本研究的调查结果进行比较和对比。我们还回顾了测试和增强原始发现的研究，并解释了是什么促使了后续研究。新研究的目的，设计和进行解释，本章结束时概述了本书的内容和结构。
In this chapter, we discuss the scholarly debate about the nature and consequences of losses from STEM majors. We also offer a summary of findings from the original study, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences (Seymour & Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997), which are revisited in findings from the present study throughout this book. The original work was designed to discover, and establish the relative importance of factors contributing to high rates of switching from STEM to non-STEM majors; the current study explores what has and has not changed in the intervening years, what new variables have arisen, and how these contribute to losses from STEM majors. The digest of original findings allows comparison and contrast with findings from the present study. We also review research that has tested and augmented the original findings and explain what prompted the follow-up study. The purposes, design, and conduct of the new study are explained, and the chapter finishes with an overview of the book’s content and structure.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Lindberg SM;Hyde JS;Petersen JL;Linn MC
通讯作者：
Linn MC