Efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: 20-year follow-up of a randomized prospective trial.

Efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: 20-year follow-up of a randomized prospective trial.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1245/s10434-014-3732-4
复制
发表时间:
2014-08
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Rudloff U
Rudloff U
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beane JD;Yang JC;White D;Steinberg SM;Rosenberg SA;Rudloff U

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本随机前瞻性研究的更新介绍了外照射放射治疗(EBRT)对肢体软组织肉瘤(STS)保肢手术(LSS)后长期总生存率、局部控制和肢体功能的影响。LSS后,肢体STS患者随机接受EBRT或单纯手术。所有高级别STS患者均接受辅助化疗。长期随访是通过电话访谈,使用问卷调查的基础上验证的方法。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存期(OS)。共有141例四肢STS患者随机接受辅助EBRT(n = 70)或LSS单独治疗(n = 71)。中位随访时间为17.9年。单独接受LSS治疗的患者的10年和20年生存率分别为77%(95%CI 66- 85%)和64%(95%CI 52- 75%),接受EBRT治疗的患者分别为82%(95%CI 72- 90%)和71%(95%CI 59- 81%)(p = 0.22)。在完成电话访谈的54例患者中,随访期间局部复发的发生率在单独LSS队列中为4%(1/24),而接受EBRT的患者为0%(0/30)(p = 0.44)。接受EBRT治疗的患者往往有更多的伤口并发症(17 vs. 12.5%,p = 0.72)、临床显著水肿(25 vs. 12%,p = 0.31)和肢体功能缺陷(15 vs. 12%,p = 0.84)。肢体STS术后辅助EBRT提供了极好的局部控制,治疗相关的发病率可接受,总生存率无统计学显著改善。
This update of a randomized, prospective study presents the effect of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) on long-term overall survival, local control, and limb function following limb-sparing surgery (LSS) for the treatment extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Following LSS, patients with extremity STS were randomized to receive EBRT or surgery alone. All patients with high-grade STS received adjuvant chemo-therapy. Long-term follow-up was obtained through telephone interviews using a questionnaire based on validated methods. Overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan–Meier method. A total of 141 patients with extremity STS were randomized to receive adjuvant EBRT (n = 70) or LSS alone (n = 71). Median follow-up was 17.9 years. The 10-and 20-year survival was 77 % (95 % CI 66–85 %) and 64 % (95 % CI 52–75 %) for patients receiving LSS alone and 82 % (95 % CI 72–90 %) and 71 % (95 % CI 59–81 %) for patients receiving EBRT (p = 0.22). Of the 54 patients who completed telephone interviews, the incidence of local recurrence during the follow-up period was 4 % (1 of 24) in the LSS alone cohort compared with 0 % (0 of 30) in those who received EBRT (p = 0.44). Patients treated with EBRT tended to have more wound complications (17 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.72), clinically significant edema (25 vs. 12 %, p = 0.31), and functional limb deficits (15 vs. 12 %, p = 0.84). Adjuvant EBRT following surgery for STS of the extremity provides excellent local control with acceptable treatment-related morbidity and no statistically significant improvement in overall survival.
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1989.7.9.1217
发表时间: 1989-09-01
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
CHANG, AE;STEINBERG, SM;ROSENBERG, SA
通讯作者: ROSENBERG, SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.007
发表时间: 2006-02-01
影响因子: 3
作者:
Livi, L;Santoni, R;Biti, G
通讯作者: Biti, G
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1996.14.3.859
发表时间: 1996-03-01
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Pisters, PWT;Harrison, LB;Brennan, MF
通讯作者: Brennan, MF
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182367aa7
发表时间: 2012-02-01
期刊: ANNALS OF SURGERY
影响因子: 9
作者:
Cahlon, Oren;Brennan, Murray F.;Alektiar, Kaled M.
通讯作者: Alektiar, Kaled M.
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.21
发表时间: 1988-03-02
影响因子: 10.3
作者:
FISHER, B;WOLMARK, N;ROBIDOUX, A
通讯作者: ROBIDOUX, A