Effects of graphic presentation on understanding medical risks and benefits among Japanese adults
Effects of graphic presentation on understanding medical risks and benefits among Japanese adults
复制标题
图形演示对日本成年人了解医疗风险和益处的影响
DOI：
10.1080/2331205x.2021.1907894
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nakayama Kazuhiro
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Danya Hitomi;Yonekura Yuki;Nakayama Kazuhiro
本研究的目的是确定最能提高日本成年人对医疗风险信息理解的呈现方法（文本、条形图或象形文字）。我们还通过计算能力的差异研究了图形格式对理解的影响。这是首次在日本进行的研究，旨在明确了解治疗的风险和益处。参与者被随机分配，以文本、条形图或象形文字三种格式之一接收关于假设医疗的风险和益处的数字信息。主要的结果变量是足够的逐字和足够的要点理解。总共有1062个人（文本354人，条形图358人，象形文字350人）被纳入分析。象形文字和条形图在提供逐字信息方面与文字没有显著差异。然而，象形文字在提供主旨信息方面与文字有显著差异（比值比[OR] 1.567, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.097-2.237），但柱状图与文字无显著差异（OR 1.390, 95%CI 0.983-1.964）。计算能力是与足够的逐字和主旨理解最密切相关的因素。我们的研究结果表明，尽管象形文字似乎是一种有效的选择，但它们的有效性仅限于计算能力较强的人，而计算能力较弱的人可能很少从象形文字中受益。
The purpose of this study was to identify the method of presentation (text, bar graphs, or pictographs) that best enhances the understanding of medical risk information among Japanese adults. We also investigated the effect of graphic format on understanding by differences in numeracy. This is the first study conducted in Japan to clarify understanding the risks and benefits of treatment. Participants were randomized to receive numerical information about the risks and benefits of a hypothetical medical treatment in one of three formats: text, bar graphs, or pictographs. The main outcome variables were adequate verbatim and adequate gist understanding. In total, 1062 individuals (text, 354; bar graphs, 358; and pictographs 350) were included in the analysis. Pictographs and bar graphs did not show significant differences from text in conferring verbatim information. However, pictographs significantly differed from text in conferring gist information (odds ratio [OR] 1.567, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.097–2.237), but bar graphs did not significantly differ from text (OR 1.390, 95%CI 0.983–1.964). Numeracy was the factor most strongly associated with adequate verbatim and gist understanding. Our results suggest that although pictographs appear to be an effective option, their effectiveness is limited to people with higher numeracy and people with lower numeracy may have little benefit from pictographs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Hibbard, Judith H.;Peters, Ellen;Tusler, Martin
通讯作者：
Tusler, Martin
风险的视觉传达。
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024191
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lipkus,IM;Hollands,JG
通讯作者：
Hollands,JG
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Garcia-Retamero, Rocio;Galesic, Mirta
通讯作者：
Galesic, Mirta
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Lipkus, Isaac M.
通讯作者：
Lipkus, Isaac M.
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Karni, Edi
通讯作者：
Karni, Edi