‘Because we are all Europeans!’ When do EU Member States use normative arguments?

‘Because we are all Europeans!’ When do EU Member States use normative arguments?
复制标题

“因为我们都是欧洲人!”欧盟成员国何时使用规范性论据?

DOI:
10.1080/13501763.2012.662072
复制
发表时间:
2012
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Janine Reinhard
Janine Reinhard
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Janine Reinhard

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近的辩论突出了沟通和辩论对解释国际谈判的进展和结果的重要性。各种研究表明,参与欧盟谈判的成员国确实使用了争论,这要么是因为争论是一种寻求真理的话语的规范性概念,要么是因为争论是一种战略争论的概念。我们还知道,背景条件,如谈判的宣传程度,或正在谈判的问题的特点,会影响争论的程度。这篇文章采取了不同的观点,重点关注特定于参与者的参数的使用。我发现,一些成员国比其他成员国更倾向于使用论点,并试图找到可以解释这种差异的解释。我假设,从讨价还价理论得出的权力资源的可用性应该会影响论点的使用。这里正在调查的主题是促成《阿姆斯特丹条约》(1997年)的欧盟政府间会议。通过对成员国立场文件进行自动内容分析,我发现,除了正在谈判的协议之外,拥有良好替代方案的成员国不太可能使用论点。
Recent debate has highlighted the importance of communication and arguments to explanations of the progress and results of international negotiations. Various studies have indicated that member states taking part in EU negotiations do indeed use arguments, either owing to a normative conception of arguing as a ‘truth seeking discourse’ or a conception of strategic arguing. We also know that contextual conditions, such as the extent to which negotiations are publicized, or the characteristics of the issue being negotiated, affect the degree of arguing. This contribution takes a different view, focusing on actor-specific use of arguments. I find that some member states are more inclined to use arguments than others and try to find explanations that could account for this variation. I hypothesize that the availability of power resources derived from bargaining theory should affect the use of arguments. The subject under investigation here is the EU Intergovernmental Conference leading to the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997). By means of an automated content analysis of member states' position papers, I show that member states who have good alternatives to the agreement being negotiated are less likely to use arguments.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Berthold Rittberger
通讯作者: Berthold Rittberger
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
F. Schimmelfennig
通讯作者: F. Schimmelfennig
欧洲的选择:从墨西拿到马斯特里赫特的社会目的和国家权力
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Moravcsik
通讯作者: A. Moravcsik
DOI: 10.1162/002081802320005531
发表时间: 2002-03-01
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Hug, S;König, T
通讯作者: König, T
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Jeffrey T. Checkel
通讯作者: Jeffrey T. Checkel