Making sense of intralocus and interlocus sexual conflict
Making sense of intralocus and interlocus sexual conflict
复制标题
理解位点内和位点间的性冲突
DOI：
10.1002/ece3.4629
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
J. Billeter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Schenkel;I. Pen;L. Beukeboom;J. Billeter
摘要性冲突的发生是因为男性和女性面临着不同的选择压力。这可能会影响女性和男性生物学的许多方面，如生理学，行为学，遗传学，甚至种群生态学。它的广泛影响引起了人们对性冲突的广泛关注。然而，性冲突的一个关键方面经常被混淆;它包括两种不同的形式：场所内和场所间性冲突（IASC和IRSC）。虽然两者都是由选择中的性别差异引起的，但它们通过不同的近端和最终机制起作用。在科学文献中，内座性冲突和IRSC往往没有被明确定义为单独的过程，这阻碍了对每种形式以及它们对性冲突的相对影响的正确理解。此外，我们目前对这些现象的遗传学知识非常有限。这使我们无法从经验上检验关于这两种形式的性冲突在进化中的作用的众多理论。在这里，我们澄清IASC和IRSC之间的区别，通过讨论男性和女性的利益如何不同，如何以及何时发生性别特异性适应，以及这如何导致进化变化。然后，我们描述了他们的研究框架，重点是未来的实验如何帮助确定这些现象背后的遗传学。通过这一点，我们希望促进对IASC和IRSC更批判性的反思，并强调对这两种现象进行遗传和机制研究的必要性。
Abstract Sexual conflict occurs because males and females are exposed to different selection pressures. This can affect many aspects of female and male biology, such as physiology, behavior, genetics, and even population ecology. Its broad impact has caused widespread interest in sexual conflict. However, a key aspect of sexual conflict is often confused; it comprises two distinct forms: intralocus and interlocus sexual conflict (IASC and IRSC). Although both are caused by sex differences in selection, they operate via different proximate and ultimate mechanisms. Intralocus sexual conflict and IRSC are often not clearly defined as separate processes in the scientific literature, which impedes a proper understanding of each form as well as of their relative impact on sexual conflict. Furthermore, our current knowledge of the genetics of these phenomena is severely limited. This prevents us from empirically testing numerous theories regarding the role of these two forms of sexual conflict in evolution. Here, we clarify the distinction between IASC and IRSC, by discussing how male and female interests differ, how and when sex‐specific adaptation occurs, and how this may lead to evolutionary change. We then describe a framework for their study, focusing on how future experiments may help identify the genetics underlying these phenomena. Through this, we hope to promote a more critical reflection on IASC and IRSC as well as underline the necessity of genetic and mechanistic studies of these two phenomena.
解决座内性冲突：遗传机制和时间框架。
DOI：
10.1093/jhered/esq011
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
The Journal of heredity
影响因子：
--
作者：
Stewart,AndrewD;Pischedda,Alison;Rice,WilliamR
通讯作者：
Rice,WilliamR
雌雄同体的性冲突
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Schärer L;Janicke ;Ramm SA
通讯作者：
Ramm SA
影响因子：
10.7
作者：
Gailey, DA;Billeter, JC;Goodwin, SF
通讯作者：
Goodwin, SF