Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised.
Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561731
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Kato T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kato T
根据双过程理论的定义，应对灵活性是指一个人放弃被认为无效的应对策略（放弃）并设计和实施替代且更有效的策略（重新应对）的能力。应对灵活性假说（CFH）表明，更丰富的应对灵活性会产生更多由压力反应引起的适应性结果，例如减少心理和身体功能障碍。我们使用 CFS-R 测试了应对灵活性量表修订版 (CFS-R) 和 CFH 的信度和效度，CFS-R 是为衡量应对灵活性而开发的。我们总共进行了三项研究，涉及 6,752 名参与者。研究 1 提供了 CFS-R 的心理测量特性，并通过验证性因子分析测试了该因子结构。研究 2 通过检查 CFS-R 的三个分量表和概念上与它们相似的变量之间的关联来估计 CFS-R 的有效性。研究 3 在控制典型应对策略和其他类型应对灵活性的影响后，使用纵向设计测试了 CFH。总体而言，CFH 得到了 CFS-R 使用的支持，研究 2 和研究 3 的结果表明它具有可接受的有效性和可靠性。我们的研究结果表明，放弃和重新应对比其他类型的应对灵活性理论框架更能预测抑郁症状的减轻。此外，对本研究中所有样本的克朗巴赫α系数（k = 9，N = 6,752）进行的荟萃分析显示，放弃的值为 0.87（95% CI [0.87, 0.88]），重新应对的值为 0.92（95% CI [0.91, 0.92]），而重新应对的值为 0.86（95% CI [0.85, 0.85]）。 0.87]）用于元应对。
Coping flexibility, as defined by the dual-process theory, refers to one’s ability to relinquish a coping strategy recognized as ineffective—abandonment—and to devise and implement an alternative and more effective strategy—re-coping. The coping flexibility hypothesis (CFH) dictates that richer coping flexibility produces more adaptive outcomes caused by stress responses, such as reduced psychological and physical dysfunction. We tested the reliability and validity of the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised (CFS-R) and the CFH using the CFS-R, which was developed to measure coping flexibility. In total, we performed three studies involving 6,752 participants. Study 1 provided the psychometric properties of the CFS-R and tested this factorial structure by a confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 estimated the validity of the CFS-R by examining the associations between its three subscales and variables that were conceptually similar to them. Study 3 tested the CFH using a longitudinal design after controlling for the effects of typical coping strategies and other types of coping flexibility. Overall, the CFH was supported by the use of the CFS-R, and the findings in Studies 2 and 3 showed that it had acceptable validity and reliability. Our findings implied that abandonment and re-coping can predict reduced depressive symptoms more than other types of theoretical framings for coping flexibility. Additionally, a meta-analysis of the Cronbach’s alphas for all samples in this study (k = 9, N = 6,752) showed that they were 0.87 (95% CI [0.87, 0.88]) for abandonment, 0.92 (95% CI [0.91, 0.92]) for re-coping, and 0.86 (95% CI [0.85, 0.87]) for meta-coping.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kato T
通讯作者：
Kato T
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Kato, Tsukasa
通讯作者：
Kato, Tsukasa
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Kato, Tsukasa
通讯作者：
Kato, Tsukasa
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Kato T
通讯作者：
Kato T